HR2375-118

Introduced

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to provide for a uniform 60-day period for Congress to review laws of the District of Columbia before such laws may take effect, to permit Congress to use the authorities and procedures available under such Act for the consideration and enactment of resolutions of disapproval of laws of the District of Columbia to disapprove specific provisions of such laws, to clarify the expedited procedures available under such Act for the consideration of such resolutions of disapproval, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 29, 2023

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates findings; sense of Congress Congress finds the following: The District of Columbia was granted limited autonomy in 1973 by Congress, who at the time did not wish to intervene in the day-to-day governance of and requires clarification of expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval The third sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. It relies on compliance mandates, grants, tax rate changes, and definition changes. The main policy areas are Law Enforcement, Finance, Criminal Justice, and Defense.

Who Benefits and How

National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, Businesses and employers affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, and Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could see lower costs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities could lose revenue opportunities, and Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face increased risk.

Key Provisions

  • Creates findings; sense of Congress Congress finds the following: The District of Columbia was granted limited autonomy in 1973 by Congress, who at the time did not wish to intervene in the day-to-day governance of...
  • Requires clarification of expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval The third sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates findings; sense of Congress Congress finds the following: The District of Columbia was granted limited autonomy in 1973 by Congress, who at the time did not wish to intervene in the day-to-day governance of and requires clarification of expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval The third sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Finance, Criminal Justice, Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill creates findings; sense of Congress Congress finds the following: The District of Columbia was granted limited autonomy in 1973 by Congress, who at the time did not wish to intervene in the day-to-day governance of and requires clarification of expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval The third sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Finance Criminal Justice Defense

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
  • Businesses and employers affected by the bill
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Businesses and employers affected by the bill:
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause:
National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill:
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
  • Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities:
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause:
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause: ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 29, 2023

Mr. Gosar introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities

2/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Finance Criminal Justice Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology