HR2189-119

Reported

Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Law-Enforcement Innovate to De-Escalate Act creates federal legal carveouts for less-than-lethal projectile devices. It amends title 18's firearm definition so less-than-lethal projectile devices are excluded from certain firearm restrictions. A qualifying device must not be designed or readily convertible to discharge common handgun, rifle, or shotgun ammunition or other projectiles above 500 feet per second; must be designed and intended for use in a way not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury; and must not accept common semiautomatic firearm ammunition feeding devices or magazine loading through the inside of a pistol grip. The Attorney General must decide manufacturer or requester classification requests within 90 days after receiving a device. A tax title separately exempts qualifying devices, listed higher-velocity non-lethal devices, and compatible shells or cartridges from the Internal Revenue Code section 4181 firearms and ammunition excise tax. Treasury must decide manufacturer, producer, or importer classification requests within 90 days, publish and annually update lists of qualifying and certain non-lethal devices, and report annually to House Ways and Means and Senate Finance. The bill also excludes these devices from the National Firearms Act firearm definition.

Who Benefits and How

Law enforcement agencies benefit from easier acquisition and use of less-than-lethal projectile devices for de-escalation and force alternatives. Less-than-lethal device manufacturers benefit from federal classification pathways, tax exemptions, and reduced firearm-law treatment. Importers and producers of qualifying devices benefit from the 90-day Treasury determination process and published eligibility lists. Public-safety training programs benefit if agencies can deploy more de-escalation tools. Local governments purchasing less-than-lethal devices benefit from reduced tax costs on qualifying devices and compatible cartridges.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Attorney General must review device classification requests under the title 18 definition within 90 days. Treasury and IRS officials must administer excise-tax exemptions, review device requests, publish annual lists, and report to Congress. ATF and firearms regulators must apply revised firearm and National Firearms Act definitions. Firearms tax revenue may decline for qualifying devices and cartridges. Civil-rights and police-accountability advocates may scrutinize expanded use of less-than-lethal projectile devices, especially devices close to the 500-feet-per-second threshold.

Key Provisions

  • Excludes defined less-than-lethal projectile devices from specified title 18 firearm restrictions.
  • Requires Attorney General classification decisions within 90 days after receiving a device.
  • Defines qualifying devices by ammunition compatibility, projectile velocity, intended nonlethal use, and magazine limits.
  • Exempts qualifying devices, listed higher-velocity non-lethal devices, and compatible shells or cartridges from the firearms and ammunition excise tax.
  • Requires Treasury classification decisions within 90 days for manufacturer, producer, or importer requests.
  • Requires Treasury to publish and annually update lists of qualifying devices and certain higher-velocity non-lethal devices.
  • Requires annual reports to House Ways and Means and Senate Finance on listed devices.
  • Excludes qualifying less-than-lethal projectile devices from the National Firearms Act firearm definition.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Exempts defined less-than-lethal projectile devices from federal firearm restrictions, firearms and ammunition excise tax, and the National Firearms Act definition of firearm; requires Attorney General and Treasury classification decisions; directs Treasury to publish and update lists of qualifying devices and higher-velocity non-lethal devices; and requires annual reports to the tax-writing committees.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Tax, Firearms

Primary Purpose

Exempts defined less-than-lethal projectile devices from federal firearm restrictions, firearms and ammunition excise tax, and the National Firearms Act definition of firearm; requires Attorney General and Treasury classification decisions; directs Treasury to publish and update lists of qualifying devices and higher-velocity non-lethal devices; and requires annual reports to the tax-writing committees.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Tax Firearms

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Law enforcement agencies
  • Less-than-lethal device manufacturers
  • Device importers
  • Device producers
  • Public-safety training programs
  • Local governments purchasing less-than-lethal devices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Device importers: , ,
Device producers: , ,
Law enforcement agencies: , ,
Public-safety training programs: , ,
Less-than-lethal device manufacturers: , ,
Local governments purchasing less-than-lethal devices: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Attorney General
  • Department of the Treasury
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
  • Firearms tax revenue
  • Police-accountability advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: eh
Attorney General: , ,
Firearms tax revenue: , ,
Internal Revenue Service: , ,
Department of the Treasury: , ,
Police-accountability advocates: , ,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives: , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 24, 2026

Received in the Senate.

Feb 12, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Feb 12, 2026

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - …

Feb 12, 2026

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1057. (consideration: …

Feb 12, 2026

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Feb 12, 2026

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - …

Feb 12, 2026

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas …

Feb 12, 2026

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Feb 11, 2026

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1057 Reported to House. Rule …

Feb 9, 2026

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1042 Reported to House. Rule …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
14 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive -7 negative

Attorney General, Law enforcement agencies

Positive-direction: Law enforcement agencies

Negative-direction: Attorney General

Manufacturing
14 mentions across 7 clauses
+14 positive

Device importers, Less-than-lethal device manufacturers

Taxpayers
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Internal Revenue Service

Advocacy Groups
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Police-accountability advocates

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Tax Firearms
Actor Mappings
"atf"
→ Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
"doj"
→ Department of Justice
"treasury"
→ Department of the Treasury

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology