HR2152-119

Reported

AI PLAN Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 14, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The AI PLAN Act directs the Treasury Secretary, Homeland Security Secretary, and Commerce Secretary to build a recurring congressional reporting process around artificial-intelligence-enabled financial crime. Congress states that adversarial use of AI in financial crimes creates national and economic security risks. Within 180 days after enactment and annually afterward, the three departments must report to Congress on interagency policies and procedures to defend U.S. financial markets, U.S. persons, U.S. businesses, and global supply chains from AI-enabled fraud, misinformation, and related financial crimes. The report must list immediately available hardware, software, resources, and technologies, and separately list additional people, technologies, and budget estimates needed by federal departments and agencies. The report must consider deepfakes, voice cloning, foreign election interference, synthetic identities, false flags and false signals that disrupt markets, and digital fraud. Within 90 days after each report, the departments must send Congress legislative recommendations and best practices for American businesses and government entities.

Who Benefits and How

Congressional oversight committees benefit from annual reports and follow-up recommendations that identify AI financial-crime risks, available tools, budget gaps, and legislative options. U.S. financial markets benefit from coordinated federal attention to deepfakes, synthetic identities, market-disrupting false signals, and digital fraud. American businesses benefit because the recommendations must include best practices for risk mitigation and incident response. U.S. persons benefit if the strategy improves detection of AI-enabled fraud and misinformation. Federal financial-crime agencies benefit from a documented inventory of technology, staffing, and budget needs.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Treasury Secretary, Homeland Security Secretary, and Commerce Secretary must jointly produce the annual reports and 90-day recommendation packages. The U.S. Trade Representative, Attorney General, Federal Reserve Board Chair, NIST Director, Commerce Under Secretary for Industry and Security, and Securities and Exchange Commission Chair must support consultation. Federal departments and agencies must identify tools, staffing, software, hardware, and budget needs. American businesses may need to adopt best practices for AI financial-crime risk mitigation and incident response. Adversarial actors using deepfakes, voice cloning, synthetic identities, or false market signals face higher detection and enforcement exposure.

Key Provisions

  • Requires Treasury, Homeland Security, and Commerce to submit an AI financial-crime report within 180 days and annually thereafter.
  • Requires descriptions of interagency policies protecting U.S. markets, persons, businesses, and global supply chains.
  • Requires inventories of immediately available technology resources and additional people, budget, hardware, and software needs.
  • Requires risk analysis for deepfakes, voice cloning, foreign election interference, synthetic identities, market-disrupting false signals, and digital fraud.
  • Directs consultation with USTR, DOJ, the Federal Reserve Board, NIST, Commerce export-control officials, and the SEC.
  • Requires legislative recommendations and best practices within 90 days after each report.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires Treasury, Homeland Security, and Commerce to report within 180 days and annually on interagency defenses against artificial-intelligence-enabled financial crimes, identify available and needed technology and budget resources, assess risks such as deepfakes, voice cloning, foreign election interference, synthetic identities, market disruption, and digital fraud, and submit follow-up legislative and best-practice recommendations.

Key Policy Areas

Artificial Intelligence, Financial Crimes, Homeland Security

Primary Purpose

Requires Treasury, Homeland Security, and Commerce to report within 180 days and annually on interagency defenses against artificial-intelligence-enabled financial crimes, identify available and needed technology and budget resources, assess risks such as deepfakes, voice cloning, foreign election interference, synthetic identities, market disruption, and digital fraud, and submit follow-up legislative and best-practice recommendations.

Policy Domains

Artificial Intelligence Financial Crimes Homeland Security

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • U.S. financial markets
  • American businesses
  • U.S. persons
  • Federal financial-crime agencies
  • Government entities using incident-response best practices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
U.S. persons:
American businesses:
U.S. financial markets:
Federal financial-crime agencies:
Congressional oversight committees:
Government entities using incident-response best practices:
Identified Costs
  • Secretary of the Treasury
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • Secretary of Commerce
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Federal departments with AI fraud responsibilities
  • Adversarial actors using AI financial crime
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Secretary of Commerce:
Secretary of the Treasury:
Secretary of Homeland Security:
Securities and Exchange Commission:
Adversarial actors using AI financial crime:
National Institute of Standards and Technology:
Federal departments with AI fraud responsibilities:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
May 13, 2026

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

May 13, 2026

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Mar 14, 2025

Mr. Nunn of Iowa (for himself and Mr. Himes) introduced …

Mar 14, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Mar 14, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Finance
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Secretary of the Treasury, U.S. financial markets

Positive-direction: U.S. financial markets

Negative-direction: Secretary of the Treasury

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

American businesses

Homeland Security
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Secretary of Homeland Security

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Secretary of Commerce

Crime
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Adversarial actors using AI financial crime

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Artificial Intelligence Financial Crimes Homeland Security
Actor Mappings
"dhs"
→ Department of Homeland Security
"sec"
→ Securities and Exchange Commission
"nist"
→ National Institute of Standards and Technology
"commerce"
→ Department of Commerce
"treasury"
→ Department of the Treasury

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology