HR207-119

Passed House

SHARKED Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SHARKED Act directs the Commerce Secretary to establish a task force to identify and address critical needs related to shark depredation, meaning shark interference with fishing and caught fish. The Secretary must appoint representatives from each Regional Fishery Management Council, each Marine Fisheries Commission, coastal state fish and wildlife agencies from each council region, and the National Marine Fisheries Service, plus an expert in highly migratory species management, a researcher in shark management and behavior, and a researcher in shark ecology. The task force must improve coordination between fishery managers and shark researchers, identify research priorities and funding opportunities, and consider shark species involved in interactions, stock assessments, how sharks become habituated to humans, angler behavior, fishery regulatory frameworks, non-lethal deterrents, healthy shark populations in the ocean food web, and climate-change effects on shark populations, prey, and behavior. It must recommend management strategies, distribute educational materials to help the fishing community reduce shark interactions through behavior and expectation changes, report to Congress within two years and every two years after that, and terminate within seven years. The bill also amends Magnuson-Stevens Act section 318(c) to add projects that better understand shark depredation, including causes of increases and how to address it, while preserving Commerce authority under the Endangered Species Act and Magnuson-Stevens Act.

Who Benefits and How

Commercial fishermen, recreational anglers, charter fishing operators, seafood businesses, Regional Fishery Management Councils, Marine Fisheries Commissions, coastal state fish and wildlife agencies, National Marine Fisheries Service scientists, shark behavior researchers, shark ecology researchers, highly migratory species managers, non-lethal deterrent developers, and coastal fishing communities benefit from coordinated research, funding priorities, management recommendations, and educational material aimed at reducing catch loss and harmful shark-human interactions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Regional Fishery Management Council representatives, Marine Fisheries Commission representatives, coastal state fish and wildlife agencies, shark researchers, highly migratory species experts, task force administrators, congressional report writers, and education-material developers must staff the task force, identify research priorities, coordinate across fisheries regions, develop management recommendations, distribute educational material, and submit biennial reports until the task force sunsets.

Key Provisions

  • Requires Commerce to establish a shark depredation task force.
  • Requires representatives from regional fishery councils, marine fisheries commissions, coastal state fish and wildlife agencies, NMFS, and shark experts.
  • Requires research priorities on shark species, stock assessments, habituation, angler behavior, regulatory frameworks, non-lethal deterrents, food-web roles, and climate effects.
  • Requires recommended management strategies and educational materials for fishing communities.
  • Requires biennial congressional reports and terminates the task force within seven years.
  • Adds shark-depredation research projects to Magnuson-Stevens Act project authority.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Commerce Secretary to establish a shark depredation task force with regional fishery council, marine commission, coastal state, NMFS, highly migratory species, shark behavior, and shark ecology expertise; directs it to coordinate research, funding priorities, management strategies, educational materials, biennial reports, and a seven-year sunset; and adds shark-depredation research projects to Magnuson-Stevens Act authority.

Key Policy Areas

Fisheries, Marine Science, Natural Resources

Primary Purpose

Requires the Commerce Secretary to establish a shark depredation task force with regional fishery council, marine commission, coastal state, NMFS, highly migratory species, shark behavior, and shark ecology expertise; directs it to coordinate research, funding priorities, management strategies, educational materials, biennial reports, and a seven-year sunset; and adds shark-depredation research projects to Magnuson-Stevens Act authority.

Policy Domains

Fisheries Marine Science Natural Resources

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Commercial fishermen
  • Recreational anglers
  • Charter fishing operators
  • Seafood businesses
  • Regional Fishery Management Councils
  • Marine Fisheries Commissions
  • Coastal state fish and wildlife agencies
  • National Marine Fisheries Service scientists
  • Shark behavior researchers
  • Non-lethal deterrent developers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Seafood businesses:
Commercial fishermen:
Recreational anglers:
Charter fishing operators:
Shark behavior researchers:
Marine Fisheries Commissions:
Non-lethal deterrent developers:
Regional Fishery Management Councils:
Coastal state fish and wildlife agencies:
National Marine Fisheries Service scientists:
Identified Costs
  • Department of Commerce
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Regional Fishery Management Council representatives
  • Marine Fisheries Commission representatives
  • Coastal state fish and wildlife agencies
  • Shark researchers
  • Highly migratory species experts
  • Task force administrators
  • Congressional report writers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Shark researchers:
Department of Commerce:
Task force administrators:
Congressional report writers:
Highly migratory species experts:
National Marine Fisheries Service:
Coastal state fish and wildlife agencies:
Marine Fisheries Commission representatives:
Regional Fishery Management Council representatives:

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 22, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Jan 22, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jan 22, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jan 21, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Jan 21, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Jan 21, 2025

Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Jan 21, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H240-242)

Jan 21, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jan 21, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

Jan 3, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
3 mentions across 1 clause
-1 negative ~2 mixed

Marine Fisheries Commissions, National Marine Fisheries Service, Regional Fishery Management Councils

Recreation & Tourism
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Charter fishing operators, Recreational anglers

Agriculture
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Commercial fishermen

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
~1 mixed

Coastal state fish and wildlife agencies

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Shark behavior researchers

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Non-lethal deterrent developers

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Fisheries Marine Science Natural Resources
Actor Mappings
"nmfs"
→ National Marine Fisheries Service
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Commerce

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology