To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(3) organizations from providing direct funding to official election organizations.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates 501(c)(3) organizations prohibited from providing direct funding to election organizations Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking and which does not participate. It relies on definition changes, grants, tax rate changes, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Lobbying.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Lobbyists, political organizations, and disclosure users affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Creates 501(c)(3) organizations prohibited from providing direct funding to election organizations Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking and which does not participate...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates 501(c)(3) organizations prohibited from providing direct funding to election organizations Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking and which does not participate.
Key Policy Areas
Lobbying
Primary Purpose
The bill creates 501(c)(3) organizations prohibited from providing direct funding to election organizations Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— by striking and which does not participate.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Lobbyists, political organizations, and disclosure users affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Tenney (for herself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Tiffany, Mr. Fitzgerald, …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology