HR1713-119

Passed House

Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 gives the Secretary of Agriculture a formal role in foreign-investment review when agriculture is at stake. Section 2 adds the Secretary to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, or the agriculture industry, including transportation, storage, and processing. Section 3 requires CFIUS, after a USDA notification of a reportable agricultural land transaction, to determine whether the transaction is a covered transaction and whether to begin a review or take other authorized action. A reportable agricultural land transaction is one the Agriculture Secretary has reason to believe is covered, based on information from or in cooperation with the intelligence community, involving agricultural land acquired by a foreign person from China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran and subject to USDA reporting under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act. The country-specific requirement ends for a foreign person from a country once that country is removed from the foreign-adversaries list at 15 CFR 791.4.

Who Benefits and How

The Department of Agriculture, CFIUS member agencies, domestic farmland owners, U.S. agricultural producers, agriculture biotechnology firms, food-supply-chain security officials, rural communities, intelligence community analysts, and national-security officials benefit because agricultural land and agribusiness transactions involving China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran receive clearer federal review triggers and USDA expertise inside the CFIUS process.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Foreign agricultural investors from China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran, USDA AFIDA reporting staff, CFIUS case officers, intelligence community analysts, transaction lawyers, agriculture biotechnology buyers, grain-storage and processing deal teams, and farmland sellers must handle extra screening, notifications, national-security review decisions, information sharing, and possible delays or mitigation in agricultural land and industry transactions.

Key Provisions

  • Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry.
  • Requires CFIUS to decide whether USDA-notified agricultural land transactions are covered transactions.
  • Requires CFIUS to decide whether to initiate review or take another authorized action after USDA notice.
  • Restricts the reportable-transaction trigger to foreign persons from China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran while those countries remain listed foreign adversaries.
  • Links reportable transactions to Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act reporting and intelligence-community information.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry, and requires CFIUS review decisions for USDA-notified agricultural land transactions involving foreign persons from listed adversary countries.

Key Policy Areas

Agriculture, National Security, Foreign Investment

Primary Purpose

Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry, and requires CFIUS review decisions for USDA-notified agricultural land transactions involving foreign persons from listed adversary countries.

Policy Domains

Agriculture National Security Foreign Investment

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Department of Agriculture
  • CFIUS member agencies
  • Domestic farmland owners
  • U.S. agricultural producers
  • Agriculture biotechnology firms
  • Food-supply-chain security officials
  • Rural communities
  • National-security officials
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Rural communities: , , ,
CFIUS member agencies: , , ,
Domestic farmland owners: , , ,
Department of Agriculture: , , ,
National-security officials: , , ,
U.S. agricultural producers: , , ,
Agriculture biotechnology firms: , , ,
Food-supply-chain security officials: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Foreign agricultural investors from China
  • Foreign agricultural investors from North Korea
  • Foreign agricultural investors from Russia
  • Foreign agricultural investors from Iran
  • USDA AFIDA reporting staff
  • CFIUS case officers
  • Intelligence community analysts
  • Transaction lawyers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
CFIUS case officers: , , ,
Transaction lawyers: , , ,
USDA AFIDA reporting staff: , , ,
Intelligence community analysts: , , ,
Foreign agricultural investors from Iran: , , ,
Foreign agricultural investors from China: , , ,
Foreign agricultural investors from Russia: , , ,
Foreign agricultural investors from North Korea: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 24, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, …

Jun 24, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jun 24, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jun 23, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jun 23, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2865-2866)

Jun 23, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Jun 23, 2025

Mrs. Wagner moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Jun 23, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Jun 23, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Jun 3, 2025

Additional sponsors: Ms. Tokuda, Mr. Barr, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Agriculture
33 mentions across 9 clauses
+8 positive -20 negative ~5 mixed

Agriculture biotechnology firms, Domestic agricultural companies, Foreign agricultural investors from China

Positive-direction: Agriculture biotechnology firms, Domestic agricultural companies

Negative-direction: Foreign agricultural investors from China, Foreign agricultural investors from Iran, Foreign agricultural investors from North Korea, Foreign agricultural investors from Russia

Government
27 mentions across 9 clauses
+8 positive -15 negative ~4 mixed

CFIUS case officers, CFIUS member agencies, Department of Agriculture

Positive-direction: Department of Agriculture, Food-supply-chain security officials

Negative-direction: CFIUS case officers, Intelligence community analysts, USDA AFIDA reporting staff

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture National Security Foreign Investment
Actor Mappings
"committee"
→ Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Agriculture

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology