Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 gives the Secretary of Agriculture a formal role in foreign-investment review when agriculture is at stake. Section 2 adds the Secretary to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, or the agriculture industry, including transportation, storage, and processing. Section 3 requires CFIUS, after a USDA notification of a reportable agricultural land transaction, to determine whether the transaction is a covered transaction and whether to begin a review or take other authorized action. A reportable agricultural land transaction is one the Agriculture Secretary has reason to believe is covered, based on information from or in cooperation with the intelligence community, involving agricultural land acquired by a foreign person from China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran and subject to USDA reporting under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act. The country-specific requirement ends for a foreign person from a country once that country is removed from the foreign-adversaries list at 15 CFR 791.4.
Who Benefits and How
The Department of Agriculture, CFIUS member agencies, domestic farmland owners, U.S. agricultural producers, agriculture biotechnology firms, food-supply-chain security officials, rural communities, intelligence community analysts, and national-security officials benefit because agricultural land and agribusiness transactions involving China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran receive clearer federal review triggers and USDA expertise inside the CFIUS process.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Foreign agricultural investors from China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran, USDA AFIDA reporting staff, CFIUS case officers, intelligence community analysts, transaction lawyers, agriculture biotechnology buyers, grain-storage and processing deal teams, and farmland sellers must handle extra screening, notifications, national-security review decisions, information sharing, and possible delays or mitigation in agricultural land and industry transactions.
Key Provisions
- Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry.
- Requires CFIUS to decide whether USDA-notified agricultural land transactions are covered transactions.
- Requires CFIUS to decide whether to initiate review or take another authorized action after USDA notice.
- Restricts the reportable-transaction trigger to foreign persons from China, North Korea, Russia, or Iran while those countries remain listed foreign adversaries.
- Links reportable transactions to Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act reporting and intelligence-community information.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry, and requires CFIUS review decisions for USDA-notified agricultural land transactions involving foreign persons from listed adversary countries.
Key Policy Areas
Agriculture, National Security, Foreign Investment
Primary Purpose
Adds the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology, and the agriculture industry, and requires CFIUS review decisions for USDA-notified agricultural land transactions involving foreign persons from listed adversary countries.
Policy Domains
Substantive provisions
Identified Gains
- Department of Agriculture
- CFIUS member agencies
- Domestic farmland owners
- U.S. agricultural producers
- Agriculture biotechnology firms
- Food-supply-chain security officials
- Rural communities
- National-security officials
Identified Costs
- Foreign agricultural investors from China
- Foreign agricultural investors from North Korea
- Foreign agricultural investors from Russia
- Foreign agricultural investors from Iran
- USDA AFIDA reporting staff
- CFIUS case officers
- Intelligence community analysts
- Transaction lawyers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2865-2866)
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Mrs. Wagner moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Additional sponsors: Ms. Tokuda, Mr. Barr, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Agriculture biotechnology firms, Domestic agricultural companies, Foreign agricultural investors from China
Positive-direction: Agriculture biotechnology firms, Domestic agricultural companies
Negative-direction: Foreign agricultural investors from China, Foreign agricultural investors from Iran, Foreign agricultural investors from North Korea, Foreign agricultural investors from Russia
CFIUS case officers, CFIUS member agencies, Department of Agriculture
Positive-direction: Department of Agriculture, Food-supply-chain security officials
Negative-direction: CFIUS case officers, Intelligence community analysts, USDA AFIDA reporting staff
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "committee"
- → Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- "secretary"
- → Secretary of Agriculture
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology