Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025 would amend the Defense Production Act to make the Secretary of Agriculture a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, for covered transactions involving agricultural land, agricultural biotechnology or the agricultural industry, including transportation, storage and processing. It does not make USDA a member for every unrelated transaction. USDA already participates in agricultural cases under case-by-case authority and appropriations provisions, including section 739 of Public Law 119-37. The bill would place the agricultural membership requirement directly in the standing CFIUS statute, without the existing appropriations provision's express Chairperson-coordination qualifier.
After a USDA notification about a qualifying agricultural-land transaction, CFIUS would have to determine whether it is a covered transaction and, if so, whether to start a review or take another action already authorized by law. The referral category has three cumulative conditions: USDA has an intelligence-informed reason to believe the transaction is covered; a foreign person from China, North Korea, Russia or Iran is acquiring an agricultural-land interest; and the transaction is subject to the existing Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act reporting requirement. The special requirement ends separately for each country if it is removed from the cited federal foreign-adversary list.
Who Benefits and How
The Department of Agriculture gains a firmer statutory role in agricultural investment decisions. CFIUS gains a required decision point for qualifying USDA referrals, potentially reducing the risk that a security-sensitive land acquisition goes unexamined. U.S. residents and agricultural communities could benefit from better assessment of national-security risks to land, biotechnology and food-production infrastructure, but those gains depend on the facts and subsequent decisions in individual transactions. The bill does not provide financial aid to farmers, guarantee higher land prices or make all foreign agricultural investment harmful.
Who Bears the Burden and How
CFIUS member agencies must evaluate the qualifying referrals, and the Department of Agriculture must support its specified membership role. In-scope foreign agricultural land purchasers from the four named countries may face additional scrutiny, delay or later restrictions under existing CFIUS powers; American landowners transacting with them may face corresponding uncertainty. The text does not automatically block purchases, require CFIUS to conduct a full review after every referral, or treat all persons of a particular ancestry as covered foreign persons. It does not expand CFIUS jurisdiction to all farmland purchases or impose a new universal private filing requirement. USDA's intelligence-informed referral condition is not itself a new mandate for intelligence agencies to collect information. Existing AFIDA reporting remains the eligibility trigger rather than a new reporting program.
Key Provisions
- Adds express USDA membership to the standing CFIUS statute for covered agricultural-land, biotechnology and industry transactions; membership is not limited to the four countries named in the land-referral section.
- Requires a CFIUS jurisdiction determination after USDA notification of a qualifying land transaction, followed by a decision whether to review or take another authorized action if it is covered.
- Requires all three referral conditions: intelligence-informed USDA concern about existing jurisdiction, acquisition by a foreign person from one of four named countries, and existing AFIDA reporting coverage.
- Limits the duration of the special referral-decision requirements country by country to the time before removal from the foreign-adversary list at 15 CFR 791.4; USDA's general agricultural membership does not share that sunset.
- Creates no automatic foreign-land ownership ban, blanket CFIUS jurisdiction expansion, new grant appropriation, or bill-specific decision deadline.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Put agriculture-specific USDA membership on CFIUS into the Defense Production Act and require CFIUS to decide whether certain USDA-referred land transactions involving foreign persons from China, North Korea, Russia or Iran fall within its jurisdiction and warrant review or other authorized action.
Key Policy Areas
Agriculture, National Security
Primary Purpose
Put agriculture-specific USDA membership on CFIUS into the Defense Production Act and require CFIUS to decide whether certain USDA-referred land transactions involving foreign persons from China, North Korea, Russia or Iran fall within its jurisdiction and warrant review or other authorized action.
Policy Domains
Agricultural Risk Review Act of 2025
Identified Gains
- Department of Agriculture
- U.S. residents
- U.S. agricultural communities
Identified Costs
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Department of Agriculture
- In-scope agricultural landowners from China
- In-scope agricultural landowners from North Korea
- In-scope agricultural landowners from Russia
- In-scope agricultural landowners from Iran
- U.S. agricultural landowners transacting with covered purchasers
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed HouseReceived; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, …
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …
Passed House (inferred from eh version)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2865-2866)
Mrs. Wagner moved to suspend the rules and pass the …
Additional sponsors: Ms. Tokuda, Mr. Barr, Mr. Nunn of Iowa, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Chinese agricultural land investors covered by the referral provision, Iranian agricultural land investors covered by the referral provision, North Korean agricultural land investors covered by the referral provision
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, Department of Agriculture
U.S. agricultural landowners transacting with covered purchasers, U.S. residents
Positive-direction: U.S. residents
Negative-direction: U.S. agricultural landowners transacting with covered purchasers
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_committee"
- → Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, chaired by the Department of the Treasury
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of Agriculture
- "foreign_person"
- → Foreign person under the existing investment-review framework, not a proxy for race or ancestry
- "intelligence_community"
- → U.S. intelligence community supplying information or cooperation for USDA's reason-to-believe determination
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
USDA membership applies to a covered transaction involving agricultural land, agriculture biotechnology, or agriculture industry including transportation, storage and processing; no four-country limitation applies to this section.
A transaction meeting all three listed conditions: intelligence-informed USDA reason to believe existing CFIUS coverage, an agricultural-land interest acquired by a foreign person of China/North Korea/Russia/Iran, and AFIDA section 2(a) reporting coverage.
The special requirements end for foreign persons of a named country when that country is removed from the foreign-adversary list at 15 CFR 791.4; this does not sunset the separate USDA membership provision.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology