HR1679-119

Passed House

Global Investment in American Jobs Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 27, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Global Investment in American Jobs Act declares that responsible foreign direct investment from trusted countries supports U.S. prosperity, competitiveness, security, jobs, services, manufacturing, advanced technologies, resilient supply chains, and reciprocal access for U.S. companies abroad. It also says investment policy should protect security interests, not disadvantage domestic investors, improve living standards, address data localization and intellectual-property barriers, and treat investment by companies owned, directed, supported, or influenced by the Chinese Communist Party as a threat. The bill then requires the Secretary of Commerce and the Comptroller General, in consultation with the Federal Interagency Investment Working Group and relevant agencies, to review U.S. competitiveness in attracting FDI from responsible private-sector entities based in trusted countries and trade barriers faced by advanced technology firms in the digital economy. The review must cover manufacturing, services, trade, digital trade, jobs, cross-border investment and data flows, federal FDI policies, greenfield investment versus mergers and acquisitions, state-owned or state-backed enterprises, CCP-influenced entities, trusted-country responses, state and local investment-attraction initiatives, data localization, forced production localization, industrial subsidies, intellectual-property infringement, technical barriers to trade, country-specific technology standards, adequacy of federal investment-attraction efforts, and CCP circumvention of existing laws. Commerce must publish Federal Register notices before the review and before final recommendations, take public comment, and report to Congress within one year. The review does not address CFIUS laws or policies.

Who Benefits and How

Responsible foreign investors from trusted countries, U.S. manufacturing workers, U.S. services firms, advanced technology companies, digital trade firms, state economic development agencies, local economic development agencies, U.S. companies seeking reciprocal market access, Commerce investment-promotion staff, and congressional trade committees benefit from a structured review of how to attract trusted capital while addressing barriers such as data localization, forced local production, industrial subsidies, intellectual-property infringement, and technical standards. The report can identify policy changes that bring jobs and investment without weakening security, labor, consumer, financial, or environmental protections.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Commerce, Government Accountability Office, Federal Interagency Investment Working Group, relevant federal agencies, Federal Register staff, public-comment reviewers, state-backed enterprises, Chinese Communist Party-influenced companies, domestic investors, and advanced technology firms must provide data, analyze investment barriers, compare trusted-country practices, review state and local initiatives, evaluate CCP circumvention, and prepare recommendations within one year.

Key Provisions

  • States that attracting responsible FDI from trusted countries is linked to U.S. prosperity, competitiveness, security, supply chains, and jobs.
  • Directs Commerce and GAO to review U.S. competitiveness in attracting trusted-country FDI and addressing advanced-technology digital-trade barriers.
  • Requires analysis of manufacturing, services, digital trade, jobs, data flows, greenfield investment, mergers and acquisitions, state-backed enterprises, and CCP-linked investment.
  • Requires review of data localization, forced production localization, industrial subsidies, intellectual-property infringement, technical barriers to trade, and country-specific technology standards.
  • Requires Federal Register notices and public-comment opportunities before the review and before final findings.
  • Requires a one-year report with recommendations that maintain U.S. security, labor, consumer, financial, and environmental protections.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires Commerce and GAO, with the Federal Interagency Investment Working Group and other agencies, to review U.S. competitiveness in attracting responsible foreign direct investment from trusted countries, analyze digital-trade barriers and state-backed investment risks including CCP influence, take public comment, and report within one year with recommendations that preserve U.S. security, labor, consumer, financial, and environmental protections.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Investment, Trade, Technology, China

Primary Purpose

Requires Commerce and GAO, with the Federal Interagency Investment Working Group and other agencies, to review U.S. competitiveness in attracting responsible foreign direct investment from trusted countries, analyze digital-trade barriers and state-backed investment risks including CCP influence, take public comment, and report within one year with recommendations that preserve U.S. security, labor, consumer, financial, and environmental protections.

Policy Domains

Foreign Investment Trade Technology China

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Responsible foreign investors
  • U.S. manufacturing workers
  • U.S. services firms
  • Advanced technology companies
  • Digital trade firms
  • State economic development agencies
  • Commerce investment-promotion staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Digital trade firms: ,
U.S. services firms: ,
U.S. manufacturing workers: ,
Advanced technology companies: ,
Responsible foreign investors: ,
Commerce investment-promotion staff: ,
State economic development agencies: ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Commerce
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Federal Interagency Investment Working Group
  • Relevant federal agencies
  • Public-comment reviewers
  • State-backed enterprises
  • Chinese Communist Party-influenced companies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Department of Commerce: ,
Public-comment reviewers: ,
State-backed enterprises: ,
Relevant federal agencies: ,
Government Accountability Office: ,
Chinese Communist Party-influenced companies: ,
Federal Interagency Investment Working Group: ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 24, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, …

Jun 24, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Jun 24, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Jun 23, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2850-2852)

Jun 23, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Jun 23, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill …

Jun 23, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Jun 23, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Jun 23, 2025

Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the …

Jun 12, 2025

Additional sponsor: Mr. Fitzpatrick

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
4 mentions across 1 clause
-4 negative

Department of Commerce, Federal Interagency Investment Working Group, Government Accountability Office

Technology
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Advanced technology companies, Digital trade firms

International Affairs
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Chinese Communist Party-influenced companies, State-backed enterprises

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Responsible foreign investors

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

U.S. manufacturing workers

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State economic development agencies

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Investment Trade Technology China
Actor Mappings
"trusted_country"
→ A country not determined by the Commerce Secretary to be a foreign adversary.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology