HR1623-119

In Committee

SCREEN Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The SCREEN Act creates a federal age-verification regime for profitable interactive computer services that create, host, or make available content harmful to minors. Beginning one year after enactment, covered platforms must use technology verification measures to ensure users are not minors and to prevent minors from accessing harmful content. A self-attestation that the user is not a minor is not enough. Platforms must publicly describe their verification process and apply the verification measure to IP addresses, including known proxy network addresses, unless available technology shows the user is outside the United States. FTC must consult computer science and software engineers, online child safety experts, victim service providers, consumer protection and privacy experts, verification technology providers, data security experts, and cryptographers. FTC must audit covered platforms, publish audit terms, issue compliance guidance within 180 days, enforce violations as unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and GAO must report after compliance begins on effectiveness, compliance rates, data security, behavioral and economic effects, and possible improvements.

Who Benefits and How

Minors benefit because covered platforms must block their access to visual content defined as harmful to minors. Parents benefit from a federal age-verification requirement instead of relying only on household filtering tools. Online child safety organizations benefit from FTC consultation and a federal enforcement structure. Age verification vendors benefit from demand for technology measures that satisfy the Act. The Federal Trade Commission benefits from audit, guidance, and enforcement authority over covered platforms.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Covered platforms must deploy age-verification technology, publish verification processes, and submit materials for FTC audits. Adult users may face privacy, data security, or access friction when proving age online. FTC staff must consult experts, conduct audits, issue guidance, and bring enforcement actions. GAO must study effectiveness, compliance rates, data security, and social or economic effects. Privacy advocates must monitor whether age-verification systems collect or expose sensitive identity data.

Key Provisions

  • Requires covered platforms to use technology age-verification measures within one year.
  • Prohibits self-attestation as sufficient proof that a user is not a minor.
  • Directs FTC consultation with technology, child safety, privacy, data security, and cryptography experts.
  • Requires FTC audits, guidance, and enforcement under unfair or deceptive acts or practices authority.
  • Requires GAO reporting on effectiveness, compliance, data security, and broader effects.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires covered online platforms that make harmful-to-minors content available for profit to use technology age-verification measures within one year, with FTC audits, guidance, enforcement, consultation requirements, and GAO reporting.

Key Policy Areas

Online Safety, Consumer Protection, Privacy

Primary Purpose

Requires covered online platforms that make harmful-to-minors content available for profit to use technology age-verification measures within one year, with FTC audits, guidance, enforcement, consultation requirements, and GAO reporting.

Policy Domains

Online Safety Consumer Protection Privacy

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Minors
  • Parents
  • Child safety organizations
  • Age verification vendors
  • Federal Trade Commission
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Minors: , , , , , ,
Parents: , , , , , ,
Age verification vendors: , , , , , ,
Federal Trade Commission: , , , , , ,
Child safety organizations: , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Covered platforms
  • Adult users
  • FTC staff
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Privacy advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
FTC staff: , , , , , ,
Adult users: , , , , , ,
Covered platforms: , , , , , ,
Privacy advocates: , , , , , ,
Government Accountability Office: , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 11, 2025

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee in the Nature of …

Dec 11, 2025

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 26, 2025

Mrs. Miller of Illinois (for herself, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. …

Feb 26, 2025

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

Feb 26, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Feb 26, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Technology
14 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive -7 negative

Age verification vendors, Covered platforms

Positive-direction: Age verification vendors

Negative-direction: Covered platforms

Children
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Minors

Low-Income Households
7 mentions across 7 clauses
+7 positive

Parents

Consumers
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Adult users

Government
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

Federal Trade Commission

7/9
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Online Safety Consumer Protection Privacy

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology