HR1608-119

Passed House

Department of Homeland Security Vehicular Terrorism Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Feb 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Department of Homeland Security Vehicular Terrorism Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2025 responds to vehicle-ramming and vehicle-based terrorist attacks, including the January 1, 2025 Bourbon Street attack in New Orleans that killed 14 people and injured at least 35 others, including two police officers. Within 180 days, the Secretary of Homeland Security, working with the TSA Administrator and CISA Director, must report to congressional homeland-security committees on DHS efforts to prevent, deter, and respond to vehicular terrorism. The report must assess tactics, motivations, domestic and international trends, and future threats involving connected vehicles, autonomous vehicles, ADAS-equipped vehicles, ride-sharing services, automotive technologies, and cybersecurity threats to AI-enabled software. It must review higher-risk sites such as airports, seaports, government facilities, power plants, substations, oil refineries, transit hubs, healthcare facilities, parades, concerts, sporting events, political rallies, holiday markets, places of worship, protests, dense urban areas, parks, schools, and tourist destinations. It must summarize actions on physical barriers, bollards, geofencing, surveillance, cybersecurity, access management, response strategies, threat detection, incident management, threat containment, private-sector coordination, intelligence sharing, federal grants, public awareness, exercises, and legal or operational barriers.

Who Benefits and How

State governments, local governments, tribal governments, territorial governments, police officers, emergency managers, airport operators, seaport operators, transit agencies, healthcare facilities, public-event organizers, places of worship, school administrators, and residents in crowded public spaces benefit from a more concrete federal assessment of where vehicle-based threats are likely and what protective measures work. Security technology vendors, physical security infrastructure manufacturers, geofencing providers, surveillance-system providers, and training providers may benefit from highlighted prevention and response tools.

Who Bears the Burden and How

DHS, TSA, CISA, vehicle rental companies, ride-sharing platforms, autonomous vehicle manufacturers, connected-vehicle software developers, freight operators, critical-infrastructure operators, federal grant managers, law-enforcement training staff, intelligence-sharing staff, and congressional homeland-security staff must supply information, assess vulnerabilities, document current countermeasures, coordinate public-private prevention planning, evaluate cyber and AI-enabled vehicle risks, and identify legal, regulatory, operational, or resource barriers.

Key Provisions

  • Finds that vehicular terrorism remains an evolving public-safety threat after the Bourbon Street attack.
  • Requires DHS, TSA, and CISA to report within 180 days on prevention, deterrence, and response to vehicular terrorism.
  • Requires assessment of current tactics, international trends, and future risks from connected, autonomous, ADAS, ride-sharing, and AI-enabled vehicle technologies.
  • Requires review of airports, seaports, government facilities, power infrastructure, transit hubs, healthcare sites, crowded events, schools, parks, and tourist destinations.
  • Requires discussion of barriers, bollards, geofencing, surveillance, cybersecurity, access management, incident response, intelligence sharing, grants, training, and exercises.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires DHS, TSA, and CISA to report within 180 days on vehicular terrorism threats, vulnerable sites, autonomous and connected-vehicle risks, protective infrastructure, geofencing, surveillance, cybersecurity, response strategies, private-sector coordination, intelligence sharing, training, and legal or operational barriers.

Key Policy Areas

Homeland Security, Transportation Security, Critical Infrastructure, Cybersecurity

Primary Purpose

Requires DHS, TSA, and CISA to report within 180 days on vehicular terrorism threats, vulnerable sites, autonomous and connected-vehicle risks, protective infrastructure, geofencing, surveillance, cybersecurity, response strategies, private-sector coordination, intelligence sharing, training, and legal or operational barriers.

Policy Domains

Homeland Security Transportation Security Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • State governments
  • Local governments
  • Police officers
  • Emergency managers
  • Airport operators
  • Transit agencies
  • Healthcare facilities
  • Public-event organizers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Police officers: , , ,
Transit agencies: , , ,
Airport operators: , , ,
Local governments: , , ,
State governments: , , ,
Emergency managers: , , ,
Healthcare facilities: , , ,
Public-event organizers: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Transportation Security Administration
  • Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
  • Vehicle rental companies
  • Ride-sharing platforms
  • Autonomous vehicle manufacturers
  • Connected-vehicle software developers
  • Freight operators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Freight operators: , , ,
Ride-sharing platforms: , , ,
Vehicle rental companies: , , ,
Department of Homeland Security: , , ,
Autonomous vehicle manufacturers: , , ,
Connected-vehicle software developers: , , ,
Transportation Security Administration: , , ,
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed House
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 18, 2025

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland …

Nov 18, 2025

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to …

Nov 18, 2025 (inferred)

Passed House (inferred from eh version)

Nov 17, 2025

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without …

Nov 17, 2025

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, …

Nov 17, 2025

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules …

Nov 17, 2025

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4691-4692)

Nov 17, 2025

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were …

Nov 17, 2025

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate …

Nov 17, 2025

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4681-4682)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
9 mentions across 3 clauses
-9 negative

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration

State & Local Government
6 mentions across 3 clauses
+6 positive

Local governments, State governments

Automotive
6 mentions across 3 clauses
-6 negative

Autonomous vehicle manufacturers, Vehicle rental companies

Transportation
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-3 negative

Ride-sharing platforms

Defense
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Security technology vendors

Construction
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Physical security infrastructure manufacturers

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown
House Roll #286

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended

Department of Homeland Security Vehicular Terrorism Prevention and Mitigation Act

Passed
400 Yea 15 Nay 18 Not Voting
Nov 17, 2025

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Homeland Security Transportation Security Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
Actor Mappings
"adas"
→ Advanced Driver Assistance System vehicle capability.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology