HR160-119

In Committee

Restoring Faith in Elections Act

119th Congress Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Restoring Faith in Elections Act is a broad federal election bill. It adds Help America Vote Act standards for mail-in ballot requests, identity and residence confirmation, deadlines, ballot fulfillment, and secure uniform mail voting when state law permits mail voting. It adds election-result reporting standards. It creates automatic voter registration through state contributing agencies, including existing-record transfers, voter protections that prevent automatic registration from being used as immigration or criminal evidence, registration portability and correction at polling places, and Election Assistance Commission grants. It applies some rules to states with existing automatic voter registration programs. It requires parity among voting methods, including signature-verification standards and cost subsidies, and statewide uniform election administration procedures for federal elections. It also creates a CISA National Deconfliction Voting Database and Clearinghouse to help states prevent duplicate registrations, purge deceased voters, and ensure only citizens vote, and it requires motor vehicle applicants in a new state to attest to voter-residence intent so old-state election authorities can be notified.

Who Benefits and How

Eligible unregistered voters benefit because contributing agencies automatically transmit registration information unless the voter declines. Mail voters benefit from standardized request forms, request deadlines, confirmation rules, and timely ballot fulfillment. Voters with disabilities benefit because contributing-agency services must be available to them to the same extent as to other individuals. State election officials benefit from EAC grants, CISA deconfliction tools, and cross-state driver-license residence notices. Election-integrity advocates benefit from federal tools to identify duplicate registrations, deceased voters, noncitizen voting, and inconsistent procedures.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State election agencies must implement automatic registration, data transfer, portability, uniform procedures, and voting-method parity rules. Contributing agencies must transmit voter-registration information, provide required notices, and protect privacy and security. The Election Assistance Commission must make implementation grants and administer state applications. CISA must create and operate the National Deconfliction Voting Database and Clearinghouse. Motor vehicle authorities must collect voter-residence attestations and notify prior-state authorities when applicants intend to register in the new state.

Key Provisions

  • Requires secure and uniform federal standards for mail-in ballot systems where state law permits mail voting.
  • Creates automatic voter registration through state contributing agencies with privacy and voter-protection rules.
  • Authorizes EAC grants for states implementing automatic registration and related requirements.
  • Requires parity among voting methods and uniform election administration procedures across state jurisdictions.
  • Establishes a CISA National Deconfliction Voting Database and Clearinghouse for voter registration integrity.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates federal election-administration standards for mail ballots, result reporting, automatic voter registration, voter data protections, registration portability, grant funding, voting-method parity, statewide uniform procedures, CISA voter deconfliction, and interstate driver-license voter-residence notices.

Key Policy Areas

Elections, Voting Rights, Cybersecurity

Primary Purpose

Creates federal election-administration standards for mail ballots, result reporting, automatic voter registration, voter data protections, registration portability, grant funding, voting-method parity, statewide uniform procedures, CISA voter deconfliction, and interstate driver-license voter-residence notices.

Policy Domains

Elections Voting Rights Cybersecurity

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Eligible voters
  • Mail voters
  • Voters with disabilities
  • State election officials
  • Election-integrity advocates
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Mail voters: , , , , , , , , ,
Eligible voters: , , , , , , , , ,
State election officials: , , , , , , , , ,
Voters with disabilities: , , , , , , , , ,
Election-integrity advocates: , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • State election agencies
  • Contributing agencies
  • Election Assistance Commission
  • CISA
  • Motor vehicle authorities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
CISA: , , , , , , , , ,
Contributing agencies: , , , , , , , , ,
State election agencies: , , , , , , , , ,
Motor vehicle authorities: , , , , , , , , ,
Election Assistance Commission: , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 3, 2025

Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Jan 3, 2025

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition …

Jan 3, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
54 mentions across 18 clauses
-54 negative

CISA, Contributing agencies, Election Assistance Commission

Voters
36 mentions across 18 clauses
+18 positive ?18 uncertain

Eligible voters, Mail voters

State & Local Government
36 mentions across 18 clauses
+18 positive -18 negative

State election agencies, State election officials

Positive-direction: State election officials

Negative-direction: State election agencies

18/22
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Elections Voting Rights Cybersecurity

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology