To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to reaffirm civil rights, victims’ rights, and consumer protections.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill creates communications Decency Act improvements Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, grants, reporting requirements, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Environmental Groups, Environment, Defense, and Technology.
Who Benefits and How
Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, and Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Creates communications Decency Act improvements Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill creates communications Decency Act improvements Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Environmental Groups, Environment, Defense, Technology
Primary Purpose
The bill creates communications Decency Act improvements Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Telecommunications providers and users affected by the bill
- National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
Kathy Castor
D-FL | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMs. Castor of Florida (for herself and Mr. Levin) introduced …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology