HR123-119

Introduced

To direct that certain assessments with respect to toxicity of chemicals be carried out by the program offices of the Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 3, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill amends the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to transfer chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from EPA IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, create a, requires transfers EPA chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from the centralized IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, requiring program offices to assign toxicity values when scientifically supported, and establishes a 15-member Hazard Identification and Dose-Response Steering Committee within EPA to coordinate chemical assessments across program offices and consider third-party assessments from federal, state. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, reporting requirements, and product standards. The main policy areas are Trade, Chemical Safety, Environmental Protection, and Science & Space.

Who Benefits and How

Third-party chemical assessment providers could gain revenue opportunities, Chemical manufacturers and industrial facilities could face lower compliance burdens, and Chemical manufacturers could face lower compliance burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program would be affected, EPA IRIS program would be affected, and Public health advocates would be affected.

Key Provisions

  • Amends the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to transfer chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from EPA IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, create a...
  • Requires transfers EPA chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from the centralized IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, requiring program offices to assign toxicity values when scientifically supported...
  • Establishes a 15-member Hazard Identification and Dose-Response Steering Committee within EPA to coordinate chemical assessments across program offices and consider third-party assessments from federal, state...
  • Establishes scientific standards for EPA chemical assessments requiring use of best available science, integration of all lines of evidence, peer review, reproducibility, and specifically supporting non-linear...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill amends the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to transfer chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from EPA IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, create a, requires transfers EPA chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from the centralized IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, requiring program offices to assign toxicity values when scientifically supported, and establishes a 15-member Hazard Identification and Dose-Response Steering Committee within EPA to coordinate chemical assessments across program offices and consider third-party assessments from federal, state.

Key Policy Areas

Trade, Chemical Safety, Environmental Protection, Science & Space

Primary Purpose

The bill amends the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to transfer chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from EPA IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, create a, requires transfers EPA chemical hazard and dose-response assessments from the centralized IRIS program to individual EPA program offices, requiring program offices to assign toxicity values when scientifically supported, and establishes a 15-member Hazard Identification and Dose-Response Steering Committee within EPA to coordinate chemical assessments across program offices and consider third-party assessments from federal, state.

Policy Domains

Trade Chemical Safety Environmental Protection Science & Space

Section 7 - Research Needs and Priorities of EPA Program Offices

Identified Gains
  • Third-party chemical assessment providers
  • Chemical manufacturers and industrial facilities
  • Chemical manufacturers
  • Industries regulated under environmental laws
  • Chemical industry
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Chemical industry:
Chemical manufacturers:
Third-party chemical assessment providers: ,
Industries regulated under environmental laws:
Chemical manufacturers and industrial facilities: ,
Identified Costs
  • EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program
  • EPA IRIS program
  • Public health advocates
  • Communities near industrial facilities
  • Communities near industrial chemical facilities
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
EPA IRIS program:
Public health advocates:
Communities near industrial facilities:
Communities near industrial chemical facilities:
EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 3, 2025

Mr. Biggs of Arizona introduced the following bill; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Manufacturing
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+5 positive

Chemical industry, Chemical manufacturers, Chemical manufacturers and industrial facilities

Government
5 mentions across 3 clauses
-2 negative ?3 uncertain

EPA IRIS program, EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program, EPA Office of Research and Development

Research & Science
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Third-party chemical assessment providers

General Public
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Communities near industrial chemical facilities, Communities near industrial facilities

Advocacy Groups
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Public health advocates

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade Chemical Safety Environmental Protection Science & Space
Actor Mappings
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
"relevant_program_office"
→ EPA program offices (Water, Air and Radiation, Land and Emergency Management, Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention)
Domains
Federal Agency Administration Chemical Safety
Actor Mappings
"committee_chair"
→ Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
"steering_committee"
→ Chemical hazard identification and dose-response steering committee
Domains
Public Health Chemical Safety
Actor Mappings
"relevant_program_office"
→ EPA program offices conducting assessments

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"covered assessment" §section_7_f_1

With respect to the evaluation of the human health effects resulting from chronic exposure to a chemical substance, a chemical hazard identification and dose-response assessment as defined by the EPA on the day before enactment.

"relevant program office" §section_7_f_2

The Office of Water, the Office of Air and Radiation, the Office of Land and Emergency Management, the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, or any successor or other office determined relevant by the Administrator.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology