HR1078-119

Reported

Respect State Housing Laws Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 6, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Respect State Housing Laws Act amends section 4024 of the CARES Act by striking subsection (c). Section 4024(c) is the federal rule that required landlords of covered dwellings to give tenants at least 30 days' notice to vacate after the CARES Act eviction moratorium period. Repealing that subsection removes the federal 30-day notice floor for covered residential properties. Eviction notice timing for those properties would instead depend on state and local housing law and any other applicable federal or contractual requirements.

Who Benefits and How

Landlords of formerly covered CARES Act properties benefit because they would no longer have to follow the federal 30-day notice-to-vacate rule when pursuing eviction after the moratorium period. Property managers benefit from simpler compliance if state law has a shorter or different notice period. State housing-law policymakers benefit because their notice rules regain practical control over covered-property eviction timing. Real estate owners with federally backed mortgages or federal housing program connections benefit from reduced federal overlay on eviction notices.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Tenants in covered dwellings bear risk because they may lose the federal 30-day minimum notice period before being required to vacate. Tenant advocates bear a policy burden because eviction protections would depend more heavily on state and local law. Courts and legal-aid providers must apply state and local notice rules without the CARES Act subsection (c) federal floor. Housing agencies and property owners must update compliance materials that reference the CARES Act notice requirement.

Key Provisions

  • Repeals CARES Act section 4024(c).
  • Removes the federal 30-day notice-to-vacate floor for covered residential properties.
  • Returns eviction notice timing to state, local, and other applicable legal requirements.
  • Reduces federal pandemic-era overlay on residential eviction notices.
  • Provides landlords and property managers less federal compliance burden when state law uses a different notice period.
  • Requires tenants and courts to rely on state, local, contractual, or other federal notice protections after the repeal.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Repeals the CARES Act section 4024(c) 30-day notice-to-vacate requirement for covered residential properties, returning timing for eviction notices after federal pandemic-era protections to otherwise applicable state and local housing law.

Key Policy Areas

Housing, Real Estate, Federalism

Primary Purpose

Repeals the CARES Act section 4024(c) 30-day notice-to-vacate requirement for covered residential properties, returning timing for eviction notices after federal pandemic-era protections to otherwise applicable state and local housing law.

Policy Domains

Housing Real Estate Federalism

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • Landlords of covered residential properties
  • Property managers
  • State housing-law policymakers
  • Real estate owners with federally connected properties
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Property managers: ,
State housing-law policymakers: ,
Landlords of covered residential properties: ,
Real estate owners with federally connected properties: ,
Identified Costs
  • Tenants in covered dwellings
  • Tenant advocates
  • Courts handling eviction cases
  • Legal aid providers
  • Housing agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Housing agencies: ,
Tenant advocates: ,
Legal aid providers: ,
Tenants in covered dwellings: ,
Courts handling eviction cases: ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 25, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 446.

Feb 25, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. …

Feb 25, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Feb 25, 2026

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. …

Dec 17, 2025

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: …

Dec 17, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Dec 16, 2025

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Feb 6, 2025

Introduced in House

Feb 6, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Feb 6, 2025

Mr. Loudermilk (for himself, Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Real Estate
8 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive -4 negative

Landlords of covered residential properties, Property managers, Tenant advocates

Positive-direction: Landlords of covered residential properties, Property managers

Negative-direction: Tenant advocates, Tenants in covered dwellings

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

State housing-law policymakers

2/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Housing Real Estate Federalism
Actor Mappings
"courts"
→ State and local courts

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology