Back to Legislators

Scott Perry

Analysis

R PA-10 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 10)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 4)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 4)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 4)

Defense

+146

Helped 1270 Hurt 1124 Unclear 750

Finance

-23

Helped 433 Hurt 456 Mixed 4 Unclear 151

Healthcare

+192

Helped 486 Hurt 294 Unclear 256

Energy

-105

Helped 333 Hurt 438 Mixed 3 Unclear 199

Agriculture

+163

Helped 325 Hurt 162 Unclear 143

Veterans Affairs

+234

Helped 390 Hurt 156 Unclear 82

Education

-19

Helped 234 Hurt 253 Unclear 120

Transportation

-58

Helped 189 Hurt 247 Unclear 124

Criminal Justice

+27

Helped 225 Hurt 198 Mixed 4 Unclear 48

Immigration

-212

Helped 87 Hurt 299 Mixed 4 Unclear 78

Trade

+16

Helped 203 Hurt 187 Mixed 2 Unclear 33

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Environment

-110

Helped 63 Hurt 173 Unclear 108

Government Operations

-16

Helped 73 Hurt 89 Unclear 135

Housing

+109

Helped 185 Hurt 76 Unclear 32

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Technology

+43

Helped 148 Hurt 105 Unclear 35

Appropriations

+45

Helped 133 Hurt 88 Unclear 14

Labor

-15

Helped 76 Hurt 91 Unclear 64

Foreign Policy

+28

Helped 103 Hurt 75 Unclear 30

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

16404 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2300 P·11 C·64 Y·1839 N·2134 w:13.0

Direct (1798), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Legislative Branch (14), Agriculture (11), Congress (11), Treasury (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Local (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

General Public 626 P·3 C·76 Y·445 N·476 w:7.0

Direct (483), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Military 407 C·2 Y·363 N·405 w:0.8

Direct (404), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 381 P·3 C·1 Y·355 N·365 w:1.5

Direct (368), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Healthcare 308 C·1 Y·211 N·301 w:0.4

Direct (287), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3)

Education 223 C·5 Y·183 N·197 w:1.0

Direct (214), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Agriculture 199 C·31 Y·162 N·168 w:1.6

Direct (191), Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2)

Transportation 196 P·9 C·7 Y·82 N·177 w:2.2

Direct (194), Labor (2)

Construction 186 Y·177 N·179 w:0.3

Direct (183), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)

Financial Services 159 C·39 Y·115 N·113 w:4.2

Direct (152), HSA (7)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2288 P·43 C·360 Y·1485 N·1537 w:55.4

Direct (1928), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), Civilian (1), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

General Public 270 C·38 Y·210 N·184 w:3.4

Direct (243), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Military 244 Y·224 N·244 w:0.3

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Defense 237 P·2 Y·227 N·220 w:2.3

Direct (233), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Transportation 188 P·7 C·29 Y·77 N·145 w:4.5

Direct (180), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Immigration 180 C·37 Y·143 N·134 w:2.6

Direct (173), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

Education 171 C·9 Y·161 N·98 w:2.5

Healthcare 152 P·4 C·2 Y·129 N·125 w:2.0

Direct (148), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Financial Services 137 P·3 C·46 Y·73 N·77 w:6.5

State & Local Government 133 C·39 Y·91 N·80 w:5.6

Direct (130), Non-Expansion (3)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+466
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+164
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			+123
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+96
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			-1
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			+6
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			-26
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			-49
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+43
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	+105
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+9
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			+127
Law Enforcement			+20
Immigration (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)	-		-112

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...