Gregory F. Murphy
AnalysisR NC-3 · House
Defense
+147Finance
+233Healthcare
+360Veterans Affairs
+348Education
+31Energy
-45Government Operations
-9Agriculture
+137Trade
+55Transportation
-39Criminal Justice
-17Housing
+58Military Procurement
+17Immigration
-182Technology
+69Federal Budget
+162Labor
-39Environment
-54Appropriations
+45Foreign Policy
+29Industry Impact Profile
18165 industry impacts
How this is computed
P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote
Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.
Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.
Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.
Positive-Effect Industries
Negative-Effect Industries
Click any row to see supporting clauses
Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.
Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)
How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.
Show vote-alignment table
| Industry | S+ | S- | O+ | O- | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government (70 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Defense (229),
Veterans Affairs (183),
Coast Guard (36),
DoD (33),
EPA (31)
+65 more
|
+290 | ||||
General Public (7 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Veterans (141),
Military Families (17),
Military (3),
Foreign (2),
Environmental Health (1)
+2 more
|
+368 | ||||
Military (4 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3),
Air Force (2),
Families (1),
Space Force (1)
|
- | +167 | |||
Defense (14 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Naval (2),
Nuclear (2),
Testing (2),
Ammunition (1),
Ground Vehicles (1)
+9 more
|
+124 | ||||
Healthcare (5 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Research (15),
Community (3),
Tribal (3),
Family Planning Services (2),
Public Health (2)
|
- | +163 | |||
Education (6 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Child Care (3),
Maritime Training (2),
Immigrant Students (1),
Religious Studies (1),
Research Universities (1)
+1 more
|
- | +52 | |||
| Cryptocurrency | - | - | +71 | ||
Transportation (6 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Foreign (2),
Labor (2),
Technology (2),
Tourism (2),
Moving (1)
+1 more
|
- | +20 | |||
Financial Services (1 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
HSA (7)
|
+41 | ||||
State & Local Government (2 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Medicaid (6),
Non-Expansion (3)
|
- | - | +40 | ||
Construction (4 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Federal Projects (1),
Federal/Military (1),
Military/Pacific (1),
Utilities/Infrastructure (1)
|
- | +123 | |||
Manufacturing (4 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Foreign (8),
Electrical Equipment (2),
Defense (1),
Foreign Adversary (1)
|
+18 | ||||
| Taxpayers | - | - | +15 | ||
Agriculture (6 sub)
Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets):
Coffee (2),
Commodities (2),
Hemp (2),
Livestock (2),
Coffee Production (1)
+1 more
|
+139 | ||||
| Law Enforcement | - | - | +42 |
Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more
Loading votes...
Sponsored & Cosponsored Bills
hr8007-118
Primary Sponsor IntroducedTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the postponement of certain deadlines by reason of Federally declared disaster applicable to the limitation on credit or refund.
hr7780-118
Primary Sponsor IntroducedTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit certain retirement plans from making investment decisions on the basis of factors other than financial risk and return factors.
hr2508-118
Primary Sponsor IntroducedTo amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that public institutions of higher education eschew policies that improperly constrain the expressive rights of students, and to ensure that private institutions of higher education are transparent about, and responsible for, their chosen speech policies.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Click an industry from the Impact Profile to view supporting clauses
Select a clause to see detailed analysis