Condemning attacks on Federal law enforcement in the State of Illinois.
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) submitted …
Summary
What This Bill Does
This Senate resolution is a symbolic statement that condemns attacks on federal law enforcement officers in Illinois, particularly those enforcing immigration laws. It criticizes the state and city governments for their criminal justice policies and expresses the Senate's support for federal immigration enforcement operations, even when state and local governments do not cooperate.
Who Benefits and How
Federal immigration enforcement agencies like ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and CBP (Customs and Border Protection) benefit from this political endorsement and symbolic support. While the resolution creates no new funding or legal powers, it provides political legitimacy to their operations in Illinois, particularly in situations where state and local officials are not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The State Government of Illinois and the City Government of Chicago face political condemnation for their criminal justice policies and approach to immigration enforcement. Local prosecutors who have implemented alternative criminal justice approaches are criticized as implementing "pro-criminal" policies. Immigrant rights advocacy groups and criminal justice reform advocates are implicitly criticized for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. However, this is purely symbolic—the resolution creates no legal obligations, penalties, or funding changes for any party.
Key Provisions
- Condemns all attacks on federal law enforcement in Illinois
- Criticizes Illinois and Chicago governments for failing to protect residents from violent crime
- Condemns state and local efforts to obstruct federal immigration enforcement operations
- Condemns "pro-criminal prosecutorial policies" that the Senate claims have increased violent crime in Chicago
- Reaffirms exclusive federal authority over immigration enforcement
- Supports prosecution of individuals who engage in violence against federal law enforcement officers
- Encourages state and local governments to cooperate with federal law enforcement
Important Note: This is a Senate Resolution (SRES), which is a non-binding expression of opinion. It does not create laws, allocate funding, or impose legal requirements on any party.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
A Senate resolution condemning attacks on federal law enforcement in Illinois and supporting federal immigration enforcement operations.
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Express Senate support for federal law enforcement and criticism of state/local governments in Illinois for not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement and for implementing criminal justice policies the Senate views as pro-criminal."
Likely Beneficiaries
- Federal law enforcement agencies (particularly immigration enforcement like ICE)
- Immigration enforcement operations in Illinois
- Political advocates for stricter immigration enforcement
Likely Burden Bearers
- State Government of Illinois (reputational/political pressure)
- City Government of Chicago (reputational/political pressure)
- State and local prosecutors implementing alternative criminal justice policies
- Individuals and groups advocating for immigrant rights or criminal justice reform
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_senate"
- → United States Senate
- "local_government"
- → City Government of Chicago
- "state_government"
- → State Government of Illinois
- "federal_law_enforcement"
- → Federal law enforcement personnel (including immigration enforcement)
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology