S98-119

Passed Senate

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service program funding.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 15, 2025

At a Glance

Read full bill text

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Apr 28, 2025

Reported by Mr. Cruz, without amendment

Apr 28, 2025 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Jan 15, 2025

Mrs. Capito (for herself, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Curtis) introduced …

Jan 15, 2025

Mrs. Capito (for herself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Curtis, and Mr. …

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill requires the FCC to create a rigorous vetting process for companies applying for high-cost universal service fund (USF) broadband deployment subsidies. Applicants must demonstrate technical, financial, and operational capabilities with a reasonable business plan before receiving funding. The FCC must set minimum penalties of at least $9,000 per violation for defaults, with base forfeitures of at least 30% of total support.

Who Benefits and How

  • Rural communities benefit from more reliable broadband deployment by ensuring only qualified providers receive funding.
  • Established telecommunications providers with proven track records benefit from qualification requirements that favor experienced operators.
  • Taxpayers/ratepayers benefit from reduced waste as unqualified applicants are screened out before receiving subsidies.
  • FCC enforcement gains clearer authority and minimum penalty floors for holding recipients accountable.

Who Bears the Burden and How

  • Smaller/newer broadband providers face higher barriers to entry with documentation and qualification requirements.
  • Companies with poor compliance history in government broadband programs face disadvantage in future applications.
  • FCC must initiate rulemaking within 180 days and develop vetting standards.
  • Providers who default face minimum $9,000 per violation penalties and at least 30% support forfeiture.

Key Provisions

  • FCC must initiate rulemaking within 180 days to establish vetting process
  • Applicants must demonstrate technical, financial, and operational capabilities
  • Must have reasonable business plan for network deployment
  • Evaluation against Digital Opportunity Data Collection technical standards
  • Applicant compliance history in government broadband programs considered
  • Minimum $9,000 penalty per pre-authorization default violation
  • Base forfeiture minimum of 30% of total support (unless FCC justifies lower)
  • Technology neutrality principle maintained
Model: claude-opus-4
Generated: Jan 9, 2026 02:31

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Requires the FCC to establish a vetting process for applicants seeking high-cost universal service fund broadband deployment funding, including technical, financial, and operational qualification requirements and minimum penalties for defaults.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Broadband Rural Development Regulatory

Legislative Strategy

"Prevent waste in rural broadband subsidies by requiring upfront qualification vetting and meaningful penalties"

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Broadband Regulatory
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"covered funding" §254(m)(1)(A)

Any new offer of high-cost universal service program funding, including reverse competitive bidding, for broadband-capable network deployment

"new covered funding award" §254(m)(1)(B)

Award of covered funding based on application submitted after rules are promulgated

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology