S958-118

Introduced

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify the requirements for the annual report on the trade agreements program and the national trade policy agenda to include an assessment of impacts on the national defense strategy and the national security strategy of the United States, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Mar 23, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires modification to annual report on trade agreements program and national trade policy agenda Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes and reporting requirements. The main policy areas are National Security and Defense.

Who Benefits and How

Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires modification to annual report on trade agreements program and national trade policy agenda Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires modification to annual report on trade agreements program and national trade policy agenda Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill requires modification to annual report on trade agreements program and national trade policy agenda Section 163(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

Policy Domains

National Security Defense

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause:
Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
  • National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause:
National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 23, 2023

Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology