S841-119

Reported

Romance Scam Prevention Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 4, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Romance Scam Prevention Act creates a federal fraud-ban notification rule for online dating services. If a member has messaged someone whose account was terminated or suspended because of significant fraud risk, the service must notify the member, identify the banned profile, warn against sending money or financial information, provide anti-fraud best practices, and include customer-service contact information. The bill sets 24-hour, three-day, and law-enforcement-delay timing rules, gives providers limited liability protection for notices, treats violations as FTC Act unfair-or-deceptive-practice violations, allows state attorneys general to sue, and preempts conflicting state notice rules.

Who Benefits and How

Online dating users benefit because they would receive direct warnings when they communicated with a profile banned for suspected fraud. Romance-scam victims benefit if timely notices stop payments, money transfers, or disclosure of financial information. State attorneys general benefit from express authority to bring civil actions for violations affecting residents. The FTC benefits from a federal rule it can enforce through existing unfair-or-deceptive-practice powers.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Online dating service providers must build fraud-ban notification systems, meet timing rules, and include required warning content. Provider compliance teams must coordinate notices with law-enforcement delay requests and customer-service channels. Fraudulent dating profiles face faster exposure once platforms impose a fraud ban. States with different notification rules lose authority where the bill preempts conflicting state requirements.

Key Provisions

  • Requires online dating services to notify members who exchanged messages with a banned member suspected of fraud.
  • Provides required notice content, including the banned profile identifier, fraud warning, financial-safety warning, best practices, and customer-service contact.
  • Establishes 24-hour, three-day, and law-enforcement-delay timing rules for fraud-ban notifications.
  • Authorizes FTC enforcement, state attorney general civil actions, limited provider liability protection, and preemption of conflicting state notice laws.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires online dating services to notify users when they communicated with a banned member suspected of fraud, sets timing and content rules, gives FTC and state enforcement authority, and preempts conflicting state notification laws.

Key Policy Areas

Consumer Protection, Technology, Fraud

Primary Purpose

Requires online dating services to notify users when they communicated with a banned member suspected of fraud, sets timing and content rules, gives FTC and state enforcement authority, and preempts conflicting state notification laws.

Policy Domains

Consumer Protection Technology Fraud

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • Online dating users
  • Romance-scam victims
  • State attorneys general
  • Federal Trade Commission
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Online dating users:
Romance-scam victims:
State attorneys general:
Federal Trade Commission:
Identified Costs
  • Online dating service providers
  • Provider compliance teams
  • Fraudulent dating profiles
  • States with conflicting notification rules
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Provider compliance teams:
Fraudulent dating profiles:
Online dating service providers:
States with conflicting notification rules:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 2, 2025

Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment

Sep 2, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Sep 2, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …

Mar 12, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …

Mar 4, 2025

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mr. Hickenlooper) introduced the following …

Mar 4, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, …

Mar 4, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Consumers
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Online dating users, Romance-scam victims

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

State attorneys general, States with conflicting notification rules

Positive-direction: State attorneys general

Negative-direction: States with conflicting notification rules

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Federal Trade Commission

Technology
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Online dating service providers

Fraud
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Fraudulent dating profiles

2/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Consumer Protection Technology Fraud
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology