To amend the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 to allow States to issue fully electronic stamps under that Act, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires authorizing fully electronic stamps Section 5 of the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 (16 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Regulated Industries and Environment.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires authorizing fully electronic stamps Section 5 of the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 (16 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires authorizing fully electronic stamps Section 5 of the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 (16 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Regulated Industries, Environment
Primary Purpose
The bill requires authorizing fully electronic stamps Section 5 of the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 (16 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill
- Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Boozman (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology