S759-119

Passed Senate

Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act

119th Congress Introduced Feb 26, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act directs the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with state and local governments, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, and other stakeholders, to develop geospatial data standards within 31 months for fishing restrictions and recreational-vessel access in the exclusive economic zone. Within four years, the Secretary, acting through the National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology, must publish GIS data on fishing closures, no-catch zones, method-of-catch limits, recreational boating and diving access, motorized propulsion, horsepower and fuel restrictions, National Marine Sanctuaries, national marine monuments, and other federally protected waters.

Who Benefits and How

Recreational anglers, commercial fishermen, recreational boaters, divers, charter operators, marine navigation app developers, geospatial data companies, state natural resource agencies, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiian organizations, Regional Ocean Partnerships, and ocean-conservation groups benefit from standardized, findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable GIS data. Users can see where fishing, boating, diving, anchoring, vessel speed, propulsion, and protected-area rules apply rather than decoding scattered notices and maps.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Department of Commerce, NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology, Interior, Agriculture, the Coast Guard, Army Corps of Engineers, Interagency Working Group on Ocean and Coastal Mapping, and cooperating state, tribal, and regional entities must standardize data, coordinate databases, update fishing-restriction boundaries in real time, update other access data at least twice each year, create public-comment processes, improve accessibility, and protect confidential or sensitive information.

Key Provisions

  • Adds definitions for fishing restrictions, Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, Native Hawaiian organizations, nonprofit organizations, recreational vessels, and the exclusive economic zone.
  • Requires Commerce to adopt geospatial data standards for fishing restrictions and recreational access within 31 months.
  • Requires a public GIS website with EEZ fishing restrictions, recreational boating and diving access, propulsion and horsepower limits, marine protected areas, National Marine Sanctuaries, national marine monuments, navigation information, bathymetry, and depth charts.
  • Requires data to be findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable, update-notified, and supported by a public questions and comments process.
  • Authorizes partnerships with states, interstate marine fisheries commissions, Regional Ocean Partnerships, data-science experts, private geospatial firms, and nonprofits.
  • Protects existing federal, state, and tribal authority over navigable waters and fisheries management.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the Commerce Secretary and National Marine Fisheries Service to standardize and publish GIS data on fishing restrictions, recreational boating and diving access, protected waters, navigation, bathymetry, and depth charts for the exclusive economic zone, with public feedback and recurring updates.

Key Policy Areas

Oceans, Fisheries, Recreation, Data Infrastructure

Primary Purpose

Requires the Commerce Secretary and National Marine Fisheries Service to standardize and publish GIS data on fishing restrictions, recreational boating and diving access, protected waters, navigation, bathymetry, and depth charts for the exclusive economic zone, with public feedback and recurring updates.

Policy Domains

Oceans Fisheries Recreation Data Infrastructure

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Recreational anglers
  • Commercial fishermen
  • Recreational boaters
  • Divers
  • Charter operators
  • Marine navigation app developers
  • State natural resource agencies
  • Indian Tribes
  • Native Hawaiian organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Divers: , , ,
Indian Tribes: , , ,
Charter operators: , , ,
Commercial fishermen: , , ,
Recreational anglers: , , ,
Recreational boaters: , , ,
Native Hawaiian organizations: , , ,
State natural resource agencies: , , ,
Marine navigation app developers: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of Commerce
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Coast Guard
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • State and tribal data partners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Coast Guard: , , ,
Department of Commerce: , , ,
Army Corps of Engineers: , , ,
State and tribal data partners: , , ,
National Marine Fisheries Service: , , ,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 11, 2025

Held at the desk.

Sep 11, 2025

Received in the House.

Sep 11, 2025

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Sep 10, 2025

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR …

Sep 10, 2025

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by …

Jul 16, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …

Jul 16, 2025

Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment

Jul 16, 2025 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Jul 16, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Mar 12, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
15 mentions across 10 clauses
-13 negative ?2 uncertain

Army Corps of Engineers, Coast Guard, Department of Commerce

Recreation & Tourism
9 mentions across 3 clauses
+9 positive

Divers, Recreational anglers, Recreational boaters

Technology
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Geospatial data companies, Marine navigation app developers

State & Local Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-3 negative ?2 uncertain

State fisheries agencies, State natural resource agencies

Fishing & Forestry
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Commercial fishermen

Nonprofits
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Regional Ocean Partnerships

Tribal Nations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Indian Tribes with fisheries authority

6/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Oceans Fisheries Recreation Data Infrastructure
Actor Mappings
"eez"
→ Exclusive economic zone
"gis"
→ Geographic information system data
"nmfs"
→ National Marine Fisheries Service

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology