To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit high deductible health plans to provide chronic disease prevention services to plan enrollees prior to satisfying their plan deductible.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires chronic disease prevention Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: (F)Preventive care services and items for chronic conditionsFor purposes. It relies on compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Healthcare Consumers and Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause could face reduced risk.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires chronic disease prevention Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: (F)Preventive care services and items for chronic conditionsFor purposes...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires chronic disease prevention Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: (F)Preventive care services and items for chronic conditionsFor purposes.
Key Policy Areas
Healthcare Consumers, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill requires chronic disease prevention Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: (F)Preventive care services and items for chronic conditionsFor purposes.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Public beneficiaries or protected communities affected by the clause
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Patients and health care consumers affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Thune (for himself and Mr. Carper) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology