Children's Artificial Intelligence Toy Safety Act of 2026
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Children's Artificial Intelligence Toy Safety Act of 2026 creates a federal research and planning process for toys that use artificial intelligence to conduct two-way interactions with users. It defines an AI-enabled toy, an open-ended AI chatbot, a child as someone under age 14, and the developers and manufacturers covered by the study.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine must study physical, mental, emotional, and social injury risks to children at different developmental stages; educational outcomes outside school; use of parental controls; marketing ethics; and whether evidence could justify temporarily suspending sales or marketing to children. The study must also examine protective actions available to Congress, federal agencies, developers, and manufacturers.
Within two years, the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety Commission must send four congressional committees a joint action plan. The plan must address possible legislation or agency action, consumer disclosure when AI is integrated into a toy, marketing and safety standards, independent review, potential temporary or permanent sales prohibitions, and planned public education. The bill itself does not establish a disclosure rule, product standard, or sales ban; it requires study and recommendations that could lead to those measures later.
Who Benefits and How
Children under 14 and their parents benefit from a systematic review of developmental harms, parental controls, marketing practices, and possible safeguards. Consumers considering AI-enabled toys benefit from potential disclosure and education recommendations. The FTC and CPSC gain an expert evidence base for future safety policy. Congress receives a concrete menu of legislative and administrative options. Researchers and child-development experts gain a formal role through the National Academies study.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The National Academies bears the research workload of evaluating a broad set of technical, developmental, educational, legal, and ethical questions. FTC and CPSC staff must coordinate and produce the joint plan within two years, then describe planned education initiatives. AI-enabled toy developers and toy manufacturers face regulatory uncertainty and reputational scrutiny because the study and plan may recommend disclosures, independent reviews, standards, or sales restrictions. No immediate private compliance duty or prohibition takes effect under this bill.
Key Provisions
- Defines AI-enabled toys, open-ended AI chatbots, children under 14, developers, manufacturers, and toys for the study.
- Directs the National Academies to assess child injury risks, educational outcomes, parental controls, marketing ethics, and evidence for possible sales suspensions.
- Requires FTC and CPSC to deliver a joint AI-toy safety action plan to specified House and Senate committees within two years.
- Requires the plan to consider disclosures, standards, independent review, sales restrictions, and public education without immediately imposing those policies.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires a National Academies study of risks and outcomes associated with interactive AI-enabled toys and directs the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety Commission to propose a joint safety action plan within two years.
Key Policy Areas
Consumer Product Safety, Artificial Intelligence, Child Protection
Primary Purpose
Requires a National Academies study of risks and outcomes associated with interactive AI-enabled toys and directs the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety Commission to propose a joint safety action plan within two years.
Policy Domains
AI-enabled toy safety study and action plan
Identified Gains
- Children under 14 who use AI-enabled toys
- Parents and guardians purchasing AI-enabled toys
- Consumers seeking AI integration disclosures
- Federal Trade Commission consumer-protection staff
- Consumer Product Safety Commission safety staff
- Congressional committees overseeing commerce, health, and education
Identified Costs
- National Academies study teams
- Federal Trade Commission staff
- Consumer Product Safety Commission staff
- AI-enabled toy developers
- Toy manufacturers integrating artificial intelligence
- AI-toy marketing departments
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedCommittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, …
Introduced in Senate
Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Children under 14 who use AI-enabled toys, Consumers considering AI-enabled toys, Parents and guardians purchasing AI-enabled toys
AI-enabled toy manufacturers, Toy manufacturers integrating artificial intelligence
Consumer Product Safety Commission staff, Federal Trade Commission staff
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "ftc"
- → Federal Trade Commission
- "cpsc"
- → Consumer Product Safety Commission
- "developers"
- → Developers of consumer artificial intelligence
- "manufacturers"
- → Manufacturers of AI-enabled toys
- "national_academies"
- → National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
- "congressional_committees"
- → Specified House and Senate oversight committees
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
A toy equipped with artificial intelligence designed for two-way interaction with a user.
Artificial intelligence that accepts input and conducts open-ended natural-language or multimodal conversations with outputs that are neither scripted nor limited to a narrow specified purpose.
An individual under 14 years of age.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology