S4949-119

Reported

Water Resources Development Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jul 13, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Water Resources Development Act of 2026 combines a nationwide Army Corps of Engineers authorization package with a four-year reauthorization of major Environmental Protection Agency water programs. For Corps projects, it requires an implementation plan and recurring congressional briefings, accelerates responses to congressional requests, delegates many continuing-authority study decisions to district commanders, and requires simplified study procedures. Projects under continuing-authority or environmental-infrastructure programs with a federal share of no more than $50 million would receive a categorical exclusion from environmental-assessment and environmental-impact-statement requirements.

The Corps generally could not pause, terminate, or defer an authorized study or project that Congress funded, except for specified cost, sponsor-capacity, court-order, settlement, or sponsor-request circumstances. District engineers would provide schedules, spending records, and recurring status notices to nonfederal sponsors. Navigation sponsors could perform operation and maintenance work, receive construction-cost credit up to 20 percent, and obtain reimbursement subject to annual caps of $10 million per sponsor and $30 million in total. The bill also directs more coordination on dredging and establishes voluntary, phased approaches for nonstructural flood-risk projects.

The measure authorizes dozens of new feasibility studies, expedites existing studies and construction activities, requires GAO and Corps reports, adds or increases local environmental-infrastructure authorizations, modifies federal cost shares, deauthorizes selected project segments, and authorizes projects recommended in Chief of Engineers reports. These provisions cover flood control, coastal-storm protection, navigation, ecosystem restoration, water supply, dam safety, dredging, and recreation projects across many States.

For drinking water, the bill authorizes Drinking Water State Revolving Fund amounts rising from $3.75 billion in fiscal year 2027 to $4.5 billion in 2030 and expands eligible uses to PFAS and other emerging contaminants, lead service lines, and qualifying wildfire-suppression projects. It authorizes $140 million annually for small and disadvantaged community assistance, $100 million annually for lead reduction, $50 million annually for small-system sustainability, $40 million annually for midsize and large system resilience, $50 million annually for school and child-care lead grants, and $75 million annually for the Indian Reservation Drinking Water Program. It creates a $15 million annual digital-infrastructure grant program for rural water systems and a $10 million annual point-of-use filter pilot for communities facing lead, PFAS, or other contaminant exceedances.

For clean water, it authorizes $3.5 billion annually for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund through 2030 and makes emerging-contaminant projects eligible. It continues annual authorizations of $280 million for sewer-overflow and stormwater grants, $50 million for decentralized wastewater systems serving low- or moderate-income households, $60 million for rural and Native Alaska sanitation, and $65 million for WIFIA administration. It also funds water research, workforce and cybersecurity training, aquifer recharge, and regional restoration programs, including $475 million annually for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and a new $7.5 million annual Southeast New England grant program.

The EPA division further establishes a $10 million annual water-sector threat-information and cybersecurity program, extends plastic-waste authorities, requires a microplastics technology study, and directs EPA to create regulatory exemptions allowing qualifying nonpotable aquifers to be used for Class VI carbon-dioxide injection wells.

Who Benefits and How

State, local, and Tribal water agencies gain access to renewed loans, grants, technical assistance, and broader eligible uses. Rural systems, disadvantaged communities, schools, child-care providers, households facing contaminated water, and Native villages receive targeted infrastructure or filtration support. Nonfederal Corps sponsors gain faster studies, more predictable schedules, cost credit and reimbursement, additional federal cost sharing, and less environmental-review process for qualifying projects. Ports, commercial waterway users, flood-prone communities, engineering firms, construction contractors, researchers, and environmental-restoration organizations benefit from new or accelerated projects and program funding.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the new and extended authorizations. The Army Corps, EPA, GAO, and other implementing bodies must issue guidance, manage grants, conduct studies, keep project schedules moving, coordinate with sponsors, and provide recurring reports and briefings. State and local recipients still must satisfy eligibility, application, cost-share, and project-management conditions. Communities near projects qualifying for the new categorical exclusion receive less project-specific NEPA analysis, creating uncertainty about how fully local environmental risks will be examined. Class VI well operators receive regulatory relief, while nearby communities face uncertain groundwater-protection risk from the mandated exemption.

Key Provisions

  • Delegates and streamlines Corps continuing-authority project reviews.
  • Exempts qualifying sub-$50 million Corps projects from NEPA assessment documents.
  • Requires funded Corps projects to continue absent specified exceptions and mandates sponsor notices.
  • Authorizes credit and capped reimbursement for sponsor-performed navigation maintenance.
  • Authorizes and accelerates Corps studies, local infrastructure projects, and project modifications.
  • Reauthorizes Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Fund programs through 2030.
  • Expands water funding to PFAS, lead-line, wildfire, cybersecurity, and digital-system projects.
  • Creates filtration, Southeast New England restoration, and water-sector cybersecurity programs.
  • Reauthorizes Great Lakes, estuary, Long Island Sound, Columbia River, and Lake Champlain programs.
  • Requires EPA rules allowing qualifying nonpotable aquifers to host Class VI injection wells.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Authorize and accelerate Army Corps water-resources projects while reforming project delivery, and reauthorize or create EPA drinking-water, wastewater, watershed-restoration, research, and water-sector cybersecurity programs for fiscal years 2027 through 2030.

Key Policy Areas

Water Resources, Flood Control, Navigation, Drinking Water, Wastewater Infrastructure, Environmental Restoration, Cybersecurity

Primary Purpose

Authorize and accelerate Army Corps water-resources projects while reforming project delivery, and reauthorize or create EPA drinking-water, wastewater, watershed-restoration, research, and water-sector cybersecurity programs for fiscal years 2027 through 2030.

Policy Domains

Water Resources Flood Control Navigation Drinking Water Wastewater Infrastructure Environmental Restoration Cybersecurity

Title XXIV - Water security and other EPA provisions

Identified Gains
  • Public water systems
  • Carbon sequestration project operators
  • Water technology researchers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Public water systems: , ,
Water technology researchers: , ,
Carbon sequestration project operators: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Communities near injection wells
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , ,
Environmental Protection Agency: , ,
Communities near injection wells: , ,

Title XXII - Clean Water Act programs

Identified Gains
  • Wastewater utilities
  • Low-income households
  • Rural Alaska villages
  • Water researchers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Water researchers: , , ,
Wastewater utilities: , , ,
Low-income households: , , ,
Rural Alaska villages: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
Environmental Protection Agency: , , ,
Government Accountability Office: , , ,

Title XII - Studies and reports

Identified Gains
  • Prospective Corps project sponsors
  • Communities named in feasibility studies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Prospective Corps project sponsors: , , ,
Communities named in feasibility studies: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
Army Corps of Engineers: , , ,
Government Accountability Office: , , ,

Title XI - Army Corps programmatic reforms

Identified Gains
  • Nonfederal Corps project sponsors
  • Commercial waterway users
  • Flood-prone communities
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Flood-prone communities: , , , , ,
Commercial waterway users: , , , , ,
Nonfederal Corps project sponsors: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Communities near categorically excluded projects
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , , , , ,
Army Corps of Engineers: , , , , ,
Communities near categorically excluded projects: , , , , ,

Titles XIII-XIV - Project modifications and authorizations

Identified Gains
  • Local water utilities
  • Commercial waterway users
  • Environmental infrastructure contractors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Local water utilities: , ,
Commercial waterway users: , ,
Environmental infrastructure contractors: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Army Corps of Engineers
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Nonfederal cost-share partners
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , ,
Army Corps of Engineers: , ,
Nonfederal cost-share partners: , ,

Title XXI - Safe Drinking Water Act programs

Identified Gains
  • Public water systems
  • Disadvantaged communities
  • Tribal water systems
  • Schools
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Schools: , , ,
Public water systems: , , ,
Tribal water systems: , , ,
Disadvantaged communities: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Grant applicants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Grant applicants: , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
Environmental Protection Agency: , , ,

Title XXIII - Regional ecosystem programs

Identified Gains
  • Watershed communities
  • Environmental restoration organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Watershed communities: , , ,
Environmental restoration organizations: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Nonfederal grant recipients
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Federal taxpayers: , , ,
Nonfederal grant recipients: , , ,
Environmental Protection Agency: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 15, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jul 15, 2026

Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Capito …

Jul 15, 2026

Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported …

Jul 13, 2026

Mrs. Capito (for herself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Schiff, …

Jul 13, 2026

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and …

Jul 13, 2026

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
425 mentions across 255 clauses
+65 positive -360 negative

Army Corps of Engineers, Congressional water-resources committees, Environmental Protection Agency

Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, Taxpayers face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Congressional water-resources committees, New Mexico tribal governments

Negative-direction: Government Accountability Office

Water Infrastructure
76 mentions across 75 clauses
+74 positive -2 negative

Alaska District permit applicants, Alternative water projects, Aquifer recharge projects

Positive-direction: Alaska District permit applicants, Aquifer recharge projects, Army Corps permit applicants, Continuing-authority project sponsors, Corps assistance recipients, Corps feasibility-study sponsors, High-hazard dam rehabilitation projects, Local water utilities, Nonfederal Corps project sponsors, Nonfederal Great Lakes sponsors, Prospective Corps project sponsors, Qualifying Corps project sponsors, Sponsors of newly authorized Corps projects, Water infrastructure borrowers

Negative-direction: Alternative water projects, Low-head dam owners

Local Communities
61 mentions across 58 clauses
+61 positive

Atlanta watershed communities, Columbia River Basin communities, Communities with lead-contaminated water

Transportation
30 mentions across 30 clauses
+30 positive

Ashtabula Harbor waterway users, Commercial waterway users, Emerging harbor sponsors

Water Supply
14 mentions across 14 clauses
+13 positive -1 negative

Downstream Willamette water customers, Midsize drinking water systems, Public water systems

Positive-direction: Downstream Willamette water customers, Public water systems, Rural public water systems, Small public water systems, Tribal water systems

Negative-direction: Midsize drinking water systems

Environment
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Dredged-material reuse projects, Environmental infrastructure contractors, Great Lakes restoration projects

Water And Sewage
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

Wastewater utilities

Real Estate
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Army Corps real-estate applicants, Recipients of Corps property

114/174
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Water Resources Flood Control Navigation
Actor Mappings
"the_corps"
→ Army Corps of Engineers
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Army
"district_commander"
→ Applicable Army Corps district commander
"nonfederal_interest"
→ Nonfederal project sponsor
Domains
Water Resources Flood Control Navigation
Actor Mappings
"the_corps"
→ Army Corps of Engineers
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Army
"comptroller_general"
→ Comptroller General of the United States
Domains
Water Resources Flood Control Navigation Environmental Restoration
Actor Mappings
"the_corps"
→ Army Corps of Engineers
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Army
"nonfederal_interest"
→ Nonfederal project sponsor
Domains
Drinking Water Cybersecurity
Actor Mappings
"eligible_entity"
→ Eligible public water system, State, Tribe, municipality, or partner institution
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Domains
Wastewater Infrastructure Water Resources Cybersecurity
Actor Mappings
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
"comptroller_general"
→ Comptroller General of the United States
Domains
Environmental Restoration Water Resources
Actor Mappings
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Domains
Cybersecurity Drinking Water Environmental Restoration
Actor Mappings
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

6 terms
"Secretary" §1001

The Secretary of the Army for Division A.

"nonstructural feature" §1118

Flood-risk measures adapted to floodplain conditions, including elevation, floodproofing, basement filling, and voluntary acquisition or relocation.

"Administrator" §2001

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for Division B.

"digital infrastructure technology" §2109

Monitoring, control, analytics, modeling, and related technology used to improve water-system efficiency, reliability, resilience, and cybersecurity.

"eligible filtration-pilot entity" §2110

A State, municipality, Tribal government, or other entity serving a community with contaminant exceedances and a remediation effort lasting at least 120 days.

"Water Information Sharing and Analysis Center" §2401

The water-sector information-sharing center referenced by the Safe Drinking Water Act.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology