Water Resources Development Act of 2026
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Water Resources Development Act of 2026 combines a nationwide Army Corps of Engineers authorization package with a four-year reauthorization of major Environmental Protection Agency water programs. For Corps projects, it requires an implementation plan and recurring congressional briefings, accelerates responses to congressional requests, delegates many continuing-authority study decisions to district commanders, and requires simplified study procedures. Projects under continuing-authority or environmental-infrastructure programs with a federal share of no more than $50 million would receive a categorical exclusion from environmental-assessment and environmental-impact-statement requirements.
The Corps generally could not pause, terminate, or defer an authorized study or project that Congress funded, except for specified cost, sponsor-capacity, court-order, settlement, or sponsor-request circumstances. District engineers would provide schedules, spending records, and recurring status notices to nonfederal sponsors. Navigation sponsors could perform operation and maintenance work, receive construction-cost credit up to 20 percent, and obtain reimbursement subject to annual caps of $10 million per sponsor and $30 million in total. The bill also directs more coordination on dredging and establishes voluntary, phased approaches for nonstructural flood-risk projects.
The measure authorizes dozens of new feasibility studies, expedites existing studies and construction activities, requires GAO and Corps reports, adds or increases local environmental-infrastructure authorizations, modifies federal cost shares, deauthorizes selected project segments, and authorizes projects recommended in Chief of Engineers reports. These provisions cover flood control, coastal-storm protection, navigation, ecosystem restoration, water supply, dam safety, dredging, and recreation projects across many States.
For drinking water, the bill authorizes Drinking Water State Revolving Fund amounts rising from $3.75 billion in fiscal year 2027 to $4.5 billion in 2030 and expands eligible uses to PFAS and other emerging contaminants, lead service lines, and qualifying wildfire-suppression projects. It authorizes $140 million annually for small and disadvantaged community assistance, $100 million annually for lead reduction, $50 million annually for small-system sustainability, $40 million annually for midsize and large system resilience, $50 million annually for school and child-care lead grants, and $75 million annually for the Indian Reservation Drinking Water Program. It creates a $15 million annual digital-infrastructure grant program for rural water systems and a $10 million annual point-of-use filter pilot for communities facing lead, PFAS, or other contaminant exceedances.
For clean water, it authorizes $3.5 billion annually for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund through 2030 and makes emerging-contaminant projects eligible. It continues annual authorizations of $280 million for sewer-overflow and stormwater grants, $50 million for decentralized wastewater systems serving low- or moderate-income households, $60 million for rural and Native Alaska sanitation, and $65 million for WIFIA administration. It also funds water research, workforce and cybersecurity training, aquifer recharge, and regional restoration programs, including $475 million annually for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and a new $7.5 million annual Southeast New England grant program.
The EPA division further establishes a $10 million annual water-sector threat-information and cybersecurity program, extends plastic-waste authorities, requires a microplastics technology study, and directs EPA to create regulatory exemptions allowing qualifying nonpotable aquifers to be used for Class VI carbon-dioxide injection wells.
Who Benefits and How
State, local, and Tribal water agencies gain access to renewed loans, grants, technical assistance, and broader eligible uses. Rural systems, disadvantaged communities, schools, child-care providers, households facing contaminated water, and Native villages receive targeted infrastructure or filtration support. Nonfederal Corps sponsors gain faster studies, more predictable schedules, cost credit and reimbursement, additional federal cost sharing, and less environmental-review process for qualifying projects. Ports, commercial waterway users, flood-prone communities, engineering firms, construction contractors, researchers, and environmental-restoration organizations benefit from new or accelerated projects and program funding.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the new and extended authorizations. The Army Corps, EPA, GAO, and other implementing bodies must issue guidance, manage grants, conduct studies, keep project schedules moving, coordinate with sponsors, and provide recurring reports and briefings. State and local recipients still must satisfy eligibility, application, cost-share, and project-management conditions. Communities near projects qualifying for the new categorical exclusion receive less project-specific NEPA analysis, creating uncertainty about how fully local environmental risks will be examined. Class VI well operators receive regulatory relief, while nearby communities face uncertain groundwater-protection risk from the mandated exemption.
Key Provisions
- Delegates and streamlines Corps continuing-authority project reviews.
- Exempts qualifying sub-$50 million Corps projects from NEPA assessment documents.
- Requires funded Corps projects to continue absent specified exceptions and mandates sponsor notices.
- Authorizes credit and capped reimbursement for sponsor-performed navigation maintenance.
- Authorizes and accelerates Corps studies, local infrastructure projects, and project modifications.
- Reauthorizes Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Fund programs through 2030.
- Expands water funding to PFAS, lead-line, wildfire, cybersecurity, and digital-system projects.
- Creates filtration, Southeast New England restoration, and water-sector cybersecurity programs.
- Reauthorizes Great Lakes, estuary, Long Island Sound, Columbia River, and Lake Champlain programs.
- Requires EPA rules allowing qualifying nonpotable aquifers to host Class VI injection wells.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Authorize and accelerate Army Corps water-resources projects while reforming project delivery, and reauthorize or create EPA drinking-water, wastewater, watershed-restoration, research, and water-sector cybersecurity programs for fiscal years 2027 through 2030.
Key Policy Areas
Water Resources, Flood Control, Navigation, Drinking Water, Wastewater Infrastructure, Environmental Restoration, Cybersecurity
Primary Purpose
Authorize and accelerate Army Corps water-resources projects while reforming project delivery, and reauthorize or create EPA drinking-water, wastewater, watershed-restoration, research, and water-sector cybersecurity programs for fiscal years 2027 through 2030.
Policy Domains
Title XXIV - Water security and other EPA provisions
Identified Gains
- Public water systems
- Carbon sequestration project operators
- Water technology researchers
Identified Costs
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal taxpayers
- Communities near injection wells
Title XXII - Clean Water Act programs
Identified Gains
- Wastewater utilities
- Low-income households
- Rural Alaska villages
- Water researchers
Identified Costs
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Government Accountability Office
- Federal taxpayers
Title XII - Studies and reports
Identified Gains
- Prospective Corps project sponsors
- Communities named in feasibility studies
Identified Costs
- Army Corps of Engineers
- Government Accountability Office
- Federal taxpayers
Title XI - Army Corps programmatic reforms
Identified Gains
- Nonfederal Corps project sponsors
- Commercial waterway users
- Flood-prone communities
Identified Costs
- Army Corps of Engineers
- Federal taxpayers
- Communities near categorically excluded projects
Titles XIII-XIV - Project modifications and authorizations
Identified Gains
- Local water utilities
- Commercial waterway users
- Environmental infrastructure contractors
Identified Costs
- Army Corps of Engineers
- Federal taxpayers
- Nonfederal cost-share partners
Title XXI - Safe Drinking Water Act programs
Identified Gains
- Public water systems
- Disadvantaged communities
- Tribal water systems
- Schools
Identified Costs
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal taxpayers
- Grant applicants
Title XXIII - Regional ecosystem programs
Identified Gains
- Watershed communities
- Environmental restoration organizations
Identified Costs
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Federal taxpayers
- Nonfederal grant recipients
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
ReportedPlaced on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Capito …
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported …
Mrs. Capito (for herself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Schiff, …
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and …
Introduced in Senate
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Army Corps of Engineers, Congressional water-resources committees, Environmental Protection Agency
Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, Taxpayers face effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Congressional water-resources committees, New Mexico tribal governments
Negative-direction: Government Accountability Office
Alaska District permit applicants, Alternative water projects, Aquifer recharge projects
Positive-direction: Alaska District permit applicants, Aquifer recharge projects, Army Corps permit applicants, Continuing-authority project sponsors, Corps assistance recipients, Corps feasibility-study sponsors, High-hazard dam rehabilitation projects, Local water utilities, Nonfederal Corps project sponsors, Nonfederal Great Lakes sponsors, Prospective Corps project sponsors, Qualifying Corps project sponsors, Sponsors of newly authorized Corps projects, Water infrastructure borrowers
Negative-direction: Alternative water projects, Low-head dam owners
Atlanta watershed communities, Columbia River Basin communities, Communities with lead-contaminated water
Ashtabula Harbor waterway users, Commercial waterway users, Emerging harbor sponsors
Downstream Willamette water customers, Midsize drinking water systems, Public water systems
Positive-direction: Downstream Willamette water customers, Public water systems, Rural public water systems, Small public water systems, Tribal water systems
Negative-direction: Midsize drinking water systems
Dredged-material reuse projects, Environmental infrastructure contractors, Great Lakes restoration projects
Army Corps real-estate applicants, Recipients of Corps property
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_corps"
- → Army Corps of Engineers
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of the Army
- "district_commander"
- → Applicable Army Corps district commander
- "nonfederal_interest"
- → Nonfederal project sponsor
- "the_corps"
- → Army Corps of Engineers
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of the Army
- "comptroller_general"
- → Comptroller General of the United States
- "the_corps"
- → Army Corps of Engineers
- "the_secretary"
- → Secretary of the Army
- "nonfederal_interest"
- → Nonfederal project sponsor
- "eligible_entity"
- → Eligible public water system, State, Tribe, municipality, or partner institution
- "the_administrator"
- → Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
- "the_administrator"
- → Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
- "comptroller_general"
- → Comptroller General of the United States
- "the_administrator"
- → Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
- "the_administrator"
- → Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
The Secretary of the Army for Division A.
Flood-risk measures adapted to floodplain conditions, including elevation, floodproofing, basement filling, and voluntary acquisition or relocation.
The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for Division B.
Monitoring, control, analytics, modeling, and related technology used to improve water-system efficiency, reliability, resilience, and cybersecurity.
A State, municipality, Tribal government, or other entity serving a community with contaminant exceedances and a remediation effort lasting at least 120 days.
The water-sector information-sharing center referenced by the Safe Drinking Water Act.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology