S465-118

Passed Senate

To require Federal law enforcement agencies to report on cases of missing or murdered Indians, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Feb 16, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

To require Federal law enforcement agencies to report on cases of missing or murdered Indians, and for other purposes.. The local Codex analysis identifies the main policy area as Technology, Health, Education, Public Lands and uses the stored bill text to provide context for clause-level classification.

Who Benefits and How

Program beneficiaries and regulated parties receiving clearer authority, Federal, state, local, or tribal implementers named in the bill may benefit where the bill creates funding, authority, exemptions, eligibility, or procedural clarity.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Agencies responsible for implementation and reporting, Regulated entities subject to new or modified requirements may bear new administrative, reporting, compliance, or implementation responsibilities.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes or modifies federal legal authority described in the bill text.
  • Directs agencies, regulated parties, or program participants to follow the updated statutory framework.
  • Provides bill-level context for downstream clause analysis.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

To require Federal law enforcement agencies to report on cases of missing or murdered Indians, and for other purposes..

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Health, Education, Public Lands

Primary Purpose

To require Federal law enforcement agencies to report on cases of missing or murdered Indians, and for other purposes..

Policy Domains

Technology Health Education Public Lands

Billwide scope

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Program beneficiaries and regulated parties receiving clearer authority
  • Federal, state, local, or tribal implementers named in the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Agencies responsible for implementation and reporting
  • Regulated entities subject to new or modified requirements
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 18, 2024

Reported by Mr. Schatz, with an amendment

Feb 16, 2023

Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the …

Feb 16, 2023

Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself, Mr. Hoeven, and Mr. Rounds) …

Feb 16, 2023 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
34 mentions across 18 clauses
+13 positive -21 negative

BIA Office of Justice Services law enforcement officers, BIA and tribal law enforcement officers, BIA law enforcement job applicants

Positive-direction: BIA Office of Justice Services law enforcement officers, BIA and tribal law enforcement officers, BIA law enforcement job applicants, Tribal justice agencies, Tribal law enforcement officers, Tribal law enforcement organizations

Negative-direction: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Justice Services, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Institute of Justice

Tribal Nations
9 mentions across 6 clauses
+9 positive

Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations

Government
6 mentions across 6 clauses
-6 negative

Department of Health and Human Services, Government Accountability Office

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

State governments (in consortium with tribes)

8/16
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Health Education Public Lands
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Attorney General shall coordin...

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

10 terms
"death investigation of interest to Indian Tribes" §definition_1

a case involving— a death investigation into the death of an Indian

"Director" §definition_2

the Deputy Bureau Director of the Office of Justice Services of the Bureau of Indian Affairs

"Federal law enforcement agency" §definition_3

the Office of Justice Services of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and any other Federal law enforcement agency that— has jurisdiction over crimes in Indian country

"missing persons case of interest to Indian Tribes" §definition_4

a case involving— a missing Indian

"Secretary" §definition_5

the Secretary of the Interior

"sexual violence case of interest to Indian Tribes" §definition_6

a case involving an allegation of sexual violence (as defined in section 204(a) of Public Law 90–284 (25 U

"unclaimed human remains case of interest to Indian Tribes" §definition_7

a case involving— unclaimed Indian remains identified by Federal, Tribal, State, or local law enforcement

"unidentified remains case of interest to Indian Tribes" §definition_8

a case involving— unidentified Indian remains

"Village" §definition_9

the Alaska Native Village Statistical Area covering all or any portion of a Native village (as defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U

"Department of Justice law enforcement agency" §definition_10

each of— the Federal Bureau of Investigation

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology