ACCESS Act
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill provides loosens a appropriation, compliance mandate, exemption provision: 2 and reduces a tax credit, compliance mandate provision: 3. Selection criteria for qualified allocation plan under the low-income housing tax credit Subparagraph (C) of section 42(m)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It relies on compliance mandates, appropriations, exemptions, and tax credits. The main policy areas are Finance and Healthcare.
Who Benefits and How
The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Provides loosens a appropriation, compliance mandate, exemption provision: 2.
- Reduces a tax credit, compliance mandate provision: 3. Selection criteria for qualified allocation plan under the low-income housing tax credit Subparagraph (C) of section 42(m)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill provides loosens a appropriation, compliance mandate, exemption provision: 2 and reduces a tax credit, compliance mandate provision: 3. Selection criteria for qualified allocation plan under the low-income housing tax credit Subparagraph (C) of section 42(m)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Key Policy Areas
Finance, Healthcare
Primary Purpose
The bill provides loosens a appropriation, compliance mandate, exemption provision: 2 and reduces a tax credit, compliance mandate provision: 3. Selection criteria for qualified allocation plan under the low-income housing tax credit Subparagraph (C) of section 42(m)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Policy Domains
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeRead twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced in Senate
Mr. Marshall introduced the following bill; which was read twice …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "secretary_of_health_and_human_services"
- → Secretary of Health and Human Services
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology