Click any annotated section or its icon to see analysis.
Referenced Laws
16 U.S.C. 3801(a)
16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C)
16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d)
16 U.S.C. 3839aa–22(b)
16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1)
16 U.S.C. 3842
16 U.S.C. 3844
7 U.S.C. 5925(d)
Section 1
1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2024.
Section 2
2. Conservation programs Section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a)) is amended— by redesignating paragraphs (18) through (27) as paragraphs (19) through (28), respectively; and by inserting after paragraph (17) the following: The term native big game species means a native species of a large mammal, including a wild deer, an elk, a pronghorn, a wild sheep, and a moose. Section 1271F(a)(2)(C) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C)) is amended by inserting , including restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, with a focus on native big game species before ; and. Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d)) is amended— in paragraph (6), by striking A producer and inserting Except as provided in paragraph (8), a producer; and by adding at the end the following: The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is— enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1. Section 1240J(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–22(b)) is amended— in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting and except as provided in paragraph (3), after paragraph (2),; and by adding at the end the following: The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is— enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii). A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1). An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1. Section 1234(g)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1)) is amended by striking $50,000 and inserting $125,000. Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d)) is amended— in paragraph (3)(F), by inserting and wildlife habitat connectivity before ; or; and in paragraph (7)(A)— in clause (iii), by striking or at the end; in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or; and by adding at the end the following: addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors. Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3842) is amended by adding at the end the following: The Secretary shall— to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to manage livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of— nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and other practices that support habitat connectivity through Federal conservation programs. Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3844) is amended by adding at the end the following: In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage— the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity. (18)Native big game speciesThe term native big game species means a native species of a large mammal, including a wild deer, an elk, a pronghorn, a wild sheep, and a moose.. (8)Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program(A)In generalThe Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—(i)enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and(ii)of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).(B)Limitations(i)Other Federal programsA producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).(ii)Protection of emergency grazing and hayingAn activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.. (3)Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program(A)In generalThe Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—(i)enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and(ii)of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).(B)Limitations(i)Other Federal programsA producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).(ii)Protection of emergency grazing and hayingAn activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.. (v)addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.. (j)Addressing barriers to habitat connectivity(1)In generalThe Secretary shall—(A)to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to manage livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and(B)provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A).(2)Availability of adequate technical assistanceThe Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of—(A)nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and (B)other practices that support habitat connectivity through Federal conservation programs.. (q)Encouragement of habitat connectivity and native big game migration corridorsIn carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage—(1)the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and(2)the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity..
Section 3
3. High-priority research and extension areas Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of— understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; or studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on— natural and cultural resources, such as— sensitive riparian areas; and crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as defined in section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a))); or overall range health. (21)Virtual fencingResearch and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of—(A)understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; or(B)studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on—(i)natural and cultural resources, such as—(I)sensitive riparian areas; and(II)crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as defined in section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801(a))); or(ii)overall range health..