S401-119

Introduced

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit certain financial service providers who deny fair access to financial services from using taxpayer funded discount window lending programs, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

The Fair Access to Banking Act requires large banks (over $10 billion in assets), credit unions, and payment card networks to provide fair access to financial services for all lawful businesses. The bill was motivated by concerns that banks are using subjective, category-based evaluations to deny services to politically unpopular but lawful industries -- essentially privatizing the discriminatory practices of the Obama-era Operation Choke Point program. The core requirement (Section 8) mandates that covered banks make financial services available on proportionally equal terms, deny services only based on quantitative, impartial risk-based standards documented in advance, not coordinate with others to deny services, and provide written justification for any denial. Reputational risk alone cannot justify denial. Enforcement is multi-pronged: banks that refuse to serve lawful customers are barred from Federal Reserve discount window lending programs, can face FDIC proceedings, are prohibited from using the Automated Clearing House Network, and payment card networks face civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation or 10% of transaction value. Individuals and businesses can sue violating banks for treble damages plus attorney fees without exhausting administrative remedies first.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits large banks, credit unions, and payment card networks from denying financial services to lawful businesses based on political, reputational, or category-based criteria, enforced through discount window access restrictions, FDIC termination authority, ACH network access denial, civil penalties, and private right of action with treble damages.

Who Benefits

  • Lawful businesses in politically controversial industries (firearms, fossil fuels, etc.)
  • Payment card network users in lawful commerce
  • Small businesses denied banking access on non-financial grounds

Who Bears Costs

  • Large banks (>$10B assets) that currently use reputational risk screening
  • Payment card networks (Visa, Mastercard, etc.)
  • Credit unions over $10B in assets

Key Policy Areas

{'domain': 'Finance', 'evidence': ['4', '5', '6', '7', '8']}, {'domain': 'Civil Rights', 'evidence': ['8']}

Primary Purpose

Prohibits large banks, credit unions, and payment card networks from denying financial services to lawful businesses based on political, reputational, or category-based criteria, enforced through discount window access restrictions, FDIC termination authority, ACH network access denial, civil penalties, and private right of action with treble damages.

Policy Domains

{'domain': 'Finance', 'evidence': ['4', '5', '6', '7', '8']} {'domain': 'Civil Rights', 'evidence': ['8']}

Legislative Strategy

"Leverage multiple enforcement mechanisms (Fed discount window, FDIC, ACH access, civil penalties, private right of action) to ensure compliance, making it costly for large banks to engage in viewpoint-based financial discrimination"

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 4, 2025

Mr. Cramer (for himself, Mr. Banks, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Financial Services
11 mentions across 6 clauses
+4 positive -5 negative ?2 uncertain

Businesses in politically controversial lawful industries, Covered banks (>B assets), Credit union members in lawful businesses

Positive-direction: Credit union members in lawful businesses, Lawful businesses in politically controversial industries, Lawful businesses needing ACH access, Lawful businesses previously denied banking access

Negative-direction: Covered banks (>B assets), ESG-oriented banks and investors, Insured credit unions, Large banks over billion in assets, Large financial institutions using ACH

Government
3 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative

Comptroller of the Currency, FDIC, Federal Reserve System

Payment Processing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Payment card networks (Visa, Mastercard, etc.)

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Lawful merchants denied payment processing

Firearms
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Firearms industry

Oil & Gas
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Fossil fuel companies

7/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Finance
Domains
Finance
Actor Mappings
"comptroller"
→ Comptroller of the Currency
Domains
Finance
Domains
Finance Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"occ"
→ Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"covered bank" §8_1

A bank with the ability to raise prices or significantly impede a person; presumed if >$10B in total assets, rebuttable by submission to OCC

"fair access to financial services" §8_2

Persons engaged in activities lawful under Federal law are able to obtain financial services without impediments caused by prejudice against or dislike for the person or their business, or favoritism for market alternatives

"financial service" §8_3

Financial products or services including banking, lending, financing, leasing, investment management, credit cards, payment processing, trading, brokerage, and insurance

"deny" §8_4

To deny, refuse to enter into, or terminate an existing financial services relationship with a person

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology