ARC Act of 2026
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill expands a appropriation, loan guarantee, reporting req provision: 2 and expands a procurement, definition change provision: 3. Exception to denial of double benefit provision for certain utilities and military installations Section 50141(d)(3) of Public Law 117–169 (136 Stat. 2043) is. It relies on appropriations, loan guarantees, reporting requirements, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Defense and Energy.
Who Benefits and How
The available clause analysis does not identify a specific beneficiary group.
Who Bears the Burden and How
No clear private burden is identified from the available clause analysis; implementing agencies may still take on administrative work.
Key Provisions
- Expands a appropriation, loan guarantee, reporting req provision: 2.
- Expands a procurement, definition change provision: 3. Exception to denial of double benefit provision for certain utilities and military installations Section 50141(d)(3) of Public Law 117–169 (136 Stat. 2043) is...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for primary purpose and policy domains.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill expands a appropriation, loan guarantee, reporting req provision: 2 and expands a procurement, definition change provision: 3. Exception to denial of double benefit provision for certain utilities and military installations Section 50141(d)(3) of Public Law 117–169 (136 Stat. 2043) is.
Key Policy Areas
Defense, Energy
Primary Purpose
The bill expands a appropriation, loan guarantee, reporting req provision: 2 and expands a procurement, definition change provision: 3. Exception to denial of double benefit provision for certain utilities and military installations Section 50141(d)(3) of Public Law 117–169 (136 Stat. 2043) is.
Policy Domains
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeRead twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and …
Introduced in Senate
Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Gallego) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "secretary_of_energy"
- → Secretary of Energy
- "secretary_of_defense"
- → Secretary of Defense
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
a schedule risk analysis that follows— the document of the Government Accountability Office entitled Schedule Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Project Schedules, numbered GAO–16–89G, and dated December 2015 (or a successor document)
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology