S370-118

Introduced

To amend section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to ensure that efforts to engage in espionage or technology transfer are considered in visa issuance, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Feb 9, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill requires expanding inadmissibility on security and related grounds Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, and trade restrictions. The main policy areas are National Security, Foreign Policy, Civil Rights, and Defense.

Who Benefits and How

The main beneficiaries are the people, organizations, or agencies identified in the bill's substantive provisions.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties, Researchers and scientific institutions affected by the bill would take on compliance duties, and National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Requires expanding inadmissibility on security and related grounds Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill requires expanding inadmissibility on security and related grounds Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

Key Policy Areas

National Security, Foreign Policy, Civil Rights, Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill requires expanding inadmissibility on security and related grounds Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

Policy Domains

National Security Foreign Policy Civil Rights Defense

Whole bill

Identified Costs
  • Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
  • Researchers and scientific institutions affected by the bill
  • National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill
  • Immigrants, asylum seekers, and border communities affected by the bill
  • Foreign businesses and cross-border trade participants affected by the bill
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Researchers and scientific institutions affected by the bill:
Immigrants, asylum seekers, and border communities affected by the bill:
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause:
Foreign businesses and cross-border trade participants affected by the bill:
National security and critical infrastructure stakeholders affected by the bill:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 9, 2023

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Schmitt, …

Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
National Security Foreign Policy Civil Rights Defense

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology