S3593-118

Reported

To provide for economic development and conservation in Washoe County, Nevada, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Jan 16, 2024

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Comprehensive public lands bill for Washoe County, Nevada including wilderness designations, land conveyances to city of Reno for parks and roads, and establishment of conservation areas.

Who Benefits and How

City of Reno receives approximately 190 acres for public purposes. Conservation interests gain wilderness and conservation area designations. Economic development advances through resolved land status.

Who Bears the Burden and How

BLM and Forest Service administer new designations. City of Reno pays conveyance costs. Land reverts if not used for public purposes.

Key Provisions

  • Conveys 190 acres to City of Reno for parks, storage, roads
  • No consideration required for conveyance
  • Establishes conservation areas
  • Designates wilderness areas

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Provides for conservation and economic development in Washoe County, Nevada including land conveyances and wilderness

Who Benefits

  • City of Reno
  • Conservation interests
  • Economic development

Who Bears Costs

  • BLM
  • Forest Service
  • City of Reno (costs)

Key Policy Areas

Public Lands, Wilderness, Economic Development, Land Conveyance

Primary Purpose

Provides for conservation and economic development in Washoe County, Nevada including land conveyances and wilderness

Policy Domains

Public Lands Wilderness Economic Development Land Conveyance

Legislative Strategy

"Balance conservation and development in growing Nevada region"

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 21, 2024

Reported by Mr. Manchin, with an amendment

Jan 16, 2024

Ms. Rosen introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Jan 16, 2024

Ms. Rosen (for herself and Ms. Cortez Masto) introduced the …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Tribal Nations
10 mentions across 10 clauses
+10 positive

Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California

Government
7 mentions across 7 clauses
-7 negative

BLM wilderness managers, Bureau of Land Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service

Environment
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Conservation and environmental groups, Conservation and recreation groups, Conservation and wildlife interests

Mining
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

Mining and development interests, Mining and mineral extraction companies

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

City of Reno, Nevada, Nevada Department of Wildlife, Washoe County

Agriculture
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Ranchers with existing grazing permits in wilderness

Real Estate
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Affordable housing developers, Real estate developers in Washoe County

Recreation
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Hunters and anglers

32/36
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Lands Wilderness Economic Development
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Interior
"secretary_concerned"
→ Secretary of Interior or Agriculture depending on land jurisdiction

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology