RECAPTURE Act
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMs. Ernst (for herself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following …
Summary
What This Bill Does
The RECAPTURE Act changes how leftover money from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program is handled. Currently, when states submit their final broadband deployment plans, any grant money they don't specifically allocate to projects goes back into a pool that can be redistributed to states. This bill requires that unallocated money instead be returned to the U.S. Treasury to reduce the federal deficit.
Who Benefits and How
The federal government benefits by reclaiming unspent BEAD funds for deficit reduction rather than distributing them to states. Fiscal conservatives and deficit hawks benefit politically by demonstrating spending restraint and returning federal dollars to the Treasury. This bill could recover millions or billions of dollars in infrastructure funds (the exact amount depends on how much states leave unallocated in their final proposals).
Who Bears the Burden and How
State and territorial governments lose flexibility to access additional BEAD funding for broadband expansion beyond what they specifically designate in their initial proposals. Rural broadband providers and internet service companies face reduced opportunities for contracts, as less total funding will be available for deployment projects. Telecommunications equipment manufacturers and construction contractors will see fewer infrastructure projects to bid on. Ultimately, residents in underserved and unserved communities may experience slower broadband deployment as available funding shrinks.
Key Provisions
• Requires the NTIA to deposit undesignated BEAD grant funds into the U.S. Treasury for deficit reduction instead of making them available to states
• Only allows states to receive portions of remaining grant funds that were "designated for a specific purpose" in their final broadband deployment proposals
• Makes technical corrections to reallocation procedures, clarifying that reallocations only occur when eligible entities fail to submit applications, not for other reasons
• Applies to both the initial allocation process and the reallocation process when funds become available
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
Requires unallocated funds from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program to be returned to the Treasury for deficit reduction instead of being distributed to states.
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Reduce federal spending by clawing back unallocated broadband infrastructure funds"
Likely Beneficiaries
- Federal government (deficit reduction)
- Fiscal conservatives
Likely Burden Bearers
- States/territories that planned for BEAD funding flexibility
- Rural broadband providers who might have received reallocated funds
- Underserved communities awaiting broadband expansion
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_assistant_secretary"
- → Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information (NTIA Administrator)
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program established under Section 60102 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (47 U.S.C. 1702)
The final proposal submitted by an eligible entity (state/territory) for broadband deployment under the BEAD program
Grant funds that have been assigned to specific broadband deployment projects in the final proposal submitted by states
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology