S3199-119

Passed Senate

988 Lifeline Location Improvement Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Nov 19, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The 988 Lifeline Location Improvement Act studies how geolocation information, including dispatchable location, could be transmitted with calls to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. One saved version requires the FCC to open a notice of inquiry within 270 days and requires GAO to report to Congress within 180 days. Another version creates an FCC-HHS advisory committee to study the same issues and recommend possible legislation.

The bill does not itself mandate live location sharing for every 988 call. It focuses on legal authority, consumer privacy, technical implementation standards, cost recovery, and funding needs for telecommunications providers, 911 system service providers, public safety answering points, the 988 Lifeline, the Veterans Crisis Line, and local crisis centers.

Who Benefits and How

People calling 988 in suicidal or mental health crisis, Veterans Crisis Line callers, local crisis centers, emergency communications centers, public safety answering points, crisis-response agencies, and congressional oversight committees benefit from a clearer record on whether geolocation could improve emergency response. Families of callers may benefit if better location tools help responders find a person in crisis when intervention is needed.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The Federal Communications Commission, Department of Health and Human Services, SAMHSA, GAO, telecommunications service providers, 911 system service providers, public safety answering points, handset manufacturers, local crisis centers, and advisory committee members must study technical standards, privacy limits, legal authority, cost recovery, and implementation needs. Privacy advocates and callers may face concerns if future policy moves toward mandatory location transmission.

Key Provisions

  • Defines 911 system service providers, dispatchable location, emergency communications centers, local crisis centers, and telecommunications service providers.
  • Requires an FCC notice of inquiry on geolocation transmission with 988 calls in one version.
  • Requires GAO to study opportunities and challenges for 988 geolocation implementation.
  • Creates an FCC-HHS advisory committee in another version.
  • Requires the study to address consumer privacy, legal authority, technical standards, and cost recovery.
  • Requires recommendations or reports to congressional committees.
  • Uses existing appropriations and authorizes no new funding in the committee version.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Studies legal, privacy, technical, and funding issues for transmitting geolocation information with calls to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline through FCC, GAO, or advisory-committee processes.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Telecommunications, Public Safety, Privacy

Primary Purpose

Studies legal, privacy, technical, and funding issues for transmitting geolocation information with calls to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline through FCC, GAO, or advisory-committee processes.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Telecommunications Public Safety Privacy

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • 988 Lifeline callers
  • Veterans Crisis Line callers
  • Local crisis centers
  • Emergency communications centers
  • Public safety answering points
  • Crisis-response agencies
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
988 Lifeline callers: , , ,
Local crisis centers: , , ,
Crisis-response agencies: , , ,
Veterans Crisis Line callers: , , ,
Public safety answering points: , , ,
Emergency communications centers: , , ,
Congressional oversight committees: , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • SAMHSA
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Telecommunications service providers
  • 911 system service providers
  • Handset manufacturers
  • Local crisis centers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
SAMHSA: , , ,
Local crisis centers: , , ,
Handset manufacturers: , , ,
911 system service providers: , , ,
Government Accountability Office: , , ,
Federal Communications Commission: , , ,
Telecommunications service providers: , , ,
Department of Health and Human Services: , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
May 12, 2026

Held at the desk.

May 12, 2026

Received in the House.

May 12, 2026

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

May 11, 2026

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and …

May 11, 2026

Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the …

Apr 22, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Apr 22, 2026

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …

Apr 22, 2026

Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment and an amendment …

Feb 12, 2026

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …

Nov 19, 2025

Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Luján, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Capito, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
17 mentions across 10 clauses
+7 positive -10 negative

Advisory committee members, Committee staff, Congressional oversight committees

Advisory committee members faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Committee staff, Congressional oversight committees

Negative-direction: Department of Health and Human Services, Federal Communications Commission, Federal agencies, Government Accountability Office

Telecommunications
7 mentions across 6 clauses
-7 negative

Federal Communications Commission, Telecommunications service providers

Mental Health
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

988 Lifeline callers

General Public
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Taxpayers

4/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Telecommunications Public Safety Privacy
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Health and Human Services
"commission"
→ Federal Communications Commission
"comptroller"
→ Comptroller General

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology