S3077-119

Introduced

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide appropriate standards for the inclusion of a term of supervised release after imprisonment, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Oct 30, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates congressional findings establishing the policy rationale for supervised release reform, citing 110,000+ people on federal supervised release, excessive caseloads for probation officers, evidence that excessive, requires comprehensive reform of federal supervised release under 18 USC 3583: (1) requires individualized assessment before imposing supervised release with on-the-record justification, and directs the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with OPM, to submit within 180 days a legislative proposal for providing law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) to federal. It relies on exemptions, definition changes, reporting requirements, and compliance mandates. The main policy areas are Criminal Justice, Finance, and Social Welfare.

Who Benefits and How

Federal probation officers could gain revenue opportunities, Federal prisoners without supervised release terms would be affected, and Federal defendants on supervised release would be affected.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Administrative Office of the United States Courts would be affected, Government Accountability Office would be affected, and Federal courts would be affected.

Key Provisions

  • Creates congressional findings establishing the policy rationale for supervised release reform, citing 110,000+ people on federal supervised release, excessive caseloads for probation officers, evidence that excessive...
  • Requires comprehensive reform of federal supervised release under 18 USC 3583: (1) requires individualized assessment before imposing supervised release with on-the-record justification.
  • Directs the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with OPM, to submit within 180 days a legislative proposal for providing law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) to federal...
  • Amends 18 USC 3624(g) to allow prisoners who were not sentenced to a term of supervised release to apply earned time credits under First Step Act section 3632 for early release of up to 12 months.
  • Mandates GAO to initiate within 1 year a study on federal post-release supervision and reentry services, covering: number of individuals on probation/supervised release since 2019, transition processes from BOP...

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates congressional findings establishing the policy rationale for supervised release reform, citing 110,000+ people on federal supervised release, excessive caseloads for probation officers, evidence that excessive, requires comprehensive reform of federal supervised release under 18 USC 3583: (1) requires individualized assessment before imposing supervised release with on-the-record justification, and directs the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with OPM, to submit within 180 days a legislative proposal for providing law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) to federal.

Key Policy Areas

Criminal Justice, Finance, Social Welfare

Primary Purpose

The bill creates congressional findings establishing the policy rationale for supervised release reform, citing 110,000+ people on federal supervised release, excessive caseloads for probation officers, evidence that excessive, requires comprehensive reform of federal supervised release under 18 USC 3583: (1) requires individualized assessment before imposing supervised release with on-the-record justification, and directs the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with OPM, to submit within 180 days a legislative proposal for providing law enforcement availability pay (LEAP) to federal.

Policy Domains

Criminal Justice Finance Social Welfare

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Federal probation officers
  • Federal prisoners without supervised release terms
  • Federal defendants on supervised release
  • Federal pretrial services officers
  • Federal public defenders
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal public defenders:
Federal probation officers: , ,
Federal pretrial services officers:
Federal defendants on supervised release:
Federal prisoners without supervised release terms:
Identified Costs
  • Administrative Office of the United States Courts
  • Government Accountability Office
  • Federal courts
  • Bureau of Prisons
  • Federal prosecutors
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal courts:
Bureau of Prisons:
Federal prosecutors:
Government Accountability Office:
Administrative Office of the United States Courts: ,

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 30, 2025

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Cramer, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

Bureau of Prisons, Federal defendants on supervised release, Federal pretrial services officers

Positive-direction: Federal defendants on supervised release, Federal pretrial services officers, Federal prisoners without supervised release terms, Federal probation officers

Negative-direction: Bureau of Prisons

Judiciary
3 mentions across 2 clauses
-3 negative

Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Federal courts

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Federal public defenders

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Government Accountability Office

5/6
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Criminal Justice Finance Social Welfare

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology