S3014-119

In Committee

Ensuring Timely Access to Generics Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Oct 16, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Tightens FDA citizen-petition procedures to make it harder to use petitions and related litigation to delay approval of generic or biosimilar products.

Who Benefits and How

Generic and biosimilar applicants could face fewer delay tactics based on late or repetitive petitions and related lawsuits.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Petitioners, including brand-drug interests, would face earlier filing deadlines, exhaustion requirements, and stricter dismissal rules in court.

Key Provisions

  • Expands the factors FDA may consider when determining whether a petition was submitted primarily to delay an application.
  • Requires petitions to be filed before related civil actions and generally within 180 days after the filer knew the underlying information.
  • Requires courts to dismiss certain actions that bypass or miss the petition process.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Tightens FDA citizen-petition procedures to make it harder to use petitions and related litigation to delay approval of generic or biosimilar products.

Key Policy Areas

Healthcare, Government Operations

Primary Purpose

Tightens FDA citizen-petition procedures to make it harder to use petitions and related litigation to delay approval of generic or biosimilar products.

Policy Domains

Healthcare Government Operations

Main Provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Generic and biosimilar applicants facing fewer petition-based delay tactics
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Petitioners and litigants seeking to use citizen petitions to delay FDA approvals
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 16, 2025

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following …

Oct 16, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, …

Oct 16, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Healthcare
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Generic and biosimilar applicants facing fewer petition-based delay tactics, Petitioners and litigants seeking to use citizen petitions to delay FDA approvals

Positive-direction: Generic and biosimilar applicants facing fewer petition-based delay tactics

Negative-direction: Petitioners and litigants seeking to use citizen petitions to delay FDA approvals

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Healthcare Government Operations

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology