To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following: (v)(1)It shall be unlawful for a person, creates use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs for large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 501(a)(1) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C, and requires severability If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this. It relies on compliance mandates, definition changes, exemptions, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Education, Energy, Environment, and Criminal Justice.
Who Benefits and How
Transportation operators and users affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens, Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities could gain revenue opportunities, and Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill could face lower compliance burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties and Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following: (v)(1)It shall be unlawful for a person...
- Creates use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs for large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 501(a)(1) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C.
- Requires severability If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following: (v)(1)It shall be unlawful for a person, creates use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs for large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 501(a)(1) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C, and requires severability If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this.
Key Policy Areas
Education, Energy, Environment, Criminal Justice
Primary Purpose
The bill requires restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following: (v)(1)It shall be unlawful for a person, creates use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs for large capacity ammunition feeding devices Section 501(a)(1) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C, and requires severability If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Transportation operators and users affected by the bill
- Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
- Environmental and public health interests affected by the bill
- Energy producers and energy supply-chain firms affected by the bill
- Educational institutions and students affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
- Regulated entities and members of the public affected by the bill
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Menendez (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Padilla, …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Law enforcement, justice-system actors, and affected communities
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology