S2950-119

Passed Senate

Scam Compound Accountability and Mobilization Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 30, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Scam Compound Accountability and Mobilization Act would require the Secretary of State, consulting Justice and Treasury, to submit a global strategy within 180 days of enactment. An interagency task force must follow within 90 days after strategy submission. Beginning 180 days after enactment, the President may impose asset-blocking sanctions on foreign persons determined to materially support, own, control, direct or act for significant scam-compound operations or enabling services. Sanctions are discretionary and person-specific, not automatic restrictions on all residents of a country discussed in the findings. The entire Act expires seven years after enactment, and the task force separately ends six years after establishment.

Who Benefits and How

Victims of cyber-enabled fraud, people at risk of fraudulent recruitment and survivors of trafficking or forced criminality are the intended beneficiaries of prevention, partner coordination and survivor-support efforts. The strategy must address recruitment fraud, online-platform engagement, awareness, partner-government capacity, corruption, money laundering and relevant PRC connections; survivor support is directed through the Ambassador at Large to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons. Survivor-support organizations and partner law-enforcement agencies could gain coordination, but the bill provides no specified new aid appropriation. A Justice Department report due within 90 days must recommend changes that could let forfeited assets support redress to U.S. citizen victims. It does not itself create a victim payment fund or entitlement.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State, Justice and Treasury bear strategy, task-force, consultation and reporting duties, and the President must report sanctioned persons and designation dates every 180 days beginning at day 180. Designated foreign scam operators and facilitators face blocked property and transactions where a U.S. jurisdictional connection exists, potentially including beneficially owned vessels. U.S. financial-services providers handling affected transactions would face sanctions-compliance work, and violations, attempts, conspiracies or causing violations trigger the referenced IEEPA civil and criminal penalty framework. Authorized U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement activities are excepted. The sanctions provision does not authorize sanctions on the importation of goods.

Key Provisions

  • Requires a 180-day global strategy identifying enabling and impacted countries, existing relevant foreign assistance, needed resources, performance indicators and prevention and survivor-support measures.
  • Establishes a task force within 90 days after the strategy, with public annual status reviews starting within one year of establishment and a possible classified annex; ends the task force after six years.
  • Authorizes discretionary property-blocking sanctions beginning at day 180 and applies IEEPA enforcement penalties, while excepting covered intelligence and authorized U.S. law-enforcement activities and excluding import-of-goods sanctions authority.
  • Permits national-interest sanctions waivers with congressional notice at least 15 days beforehand; notice must identify the beneficiary and, for an individual, explain the national-security justification.
  • Requires a 90-day assessment of forfeiture-law barriers and recommendations for U.S.-citizen victim redress, without authorizing disbursement of forfeited assets under this bill.
  • Provides a seven-year sunset for the entire Act and preserves the strategy limitation against creating obligations for U.S. or State law-enforcement and U.S. intelligence activities.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Require a global strategy and interagency task force against scam compounds, authorize targeted asset-blocking sanctions with exceptions and oversight, and assess a future forfeited-asset redress mechanism for U.S. victims.

Key Policy Areas

Transnational fraud, Human trafficking, Targeted financial sanctions

Primary Purpose

Require a global strategy and interagency task force against scam compounds, authorize targeted asset-blocking sanctions with exceptions and oversight, and assess a future forfeited-asset redress mechanism for U.S. victims.

Policy Domains

Transnational fraud Human trafficking Targeted financial sanctions

Scam Compound Accountability and Mobilization Act

Identified Gains
  • Victims of cyber-enabled fraud
  • At-risk recruitment applicants
  • Survivors of trafficking and forced criminality
  • Survivor-support organizations
  • Partner law enforcement agencies
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
At-risk recruitment applicants: , , , ,
Survivor-support organizations: , , , ,
Victims of cyber-enabled fraud: , , , ,
Partner law enforcement agencies: , , , ,
Survivors of trafficking and forced criminality: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Department of State
  • Department of Justice
  • Department of the Treasury
  • Executive Office of the President
  • U.S. financial-services providers
  • Foreign scam-compound operators
  • Foreign facilitators of scam-compound operations
Model: codex-gpt-6-inline | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Department of State: , , , ,
Department of Justice: , , , ,
Department of the Treasury: , , , ,
Foreign scam-compound operators: , , , ,
Executive Office of the President: , , , ,
U.S. financial-services providers: , , , ,
Foreign facilitators of scam-compound operations: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 9, 2025

Held at the desk.

Dec 9, 2025

Received in the House.

Dec 9, 2025

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Dec 8, 2025

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR …

Dec 8, 2025

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by …

Oct 30, 2025

Reported by Mr. Risch, with an amendment

Oct 30, 2025 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Oct 30, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Oct 30, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an …

Oct 22, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
14 mentions across 5 clauses
+3 positive -11 negative

Department of Justice, Department of State, Department of the Treasury

Department of Justice, Department of State, Department of the Treasury face effects in multiple directions

General Public
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -2 negative

At-risk recruitment applicants, Foreign facilitators of scam-compound operations, Foreign persons exposed to this Act's sanctions

Positive-direction: At-risk recruitment applicants, Foreign persons exposed to this Act's sanctions, Survivors of forced criminality

Negative-direction: Foreign facilitators of scam-compound operations, Foreign scam-compound operators

Financial Services
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

U.S. financial-services providers handling blocked transactions

8/15
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Transnational fraud Human trafficking Targeted financial sanctions
Actor Mappings
"president"
→ President of the United States; sanctions, waivers and sanctions reports
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General; leads forfeiture-redress assessment and co-leads status reviews
"secretary_of_state"
→ Secretary of State; leads the strategy and task-force establishment
"treasury_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"ambassador_at_large"
→ Ambassador at Large to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

Note: {'description': 'The strategy addresses accountability and investigation-related goals but expressly cannot affect or create obligations for covered U.S. or State law-enforcement or U.S. intelligence activities. Section 6 independently authorizes sanctions subject to its own exceptions. The waiver standard is national interest, while detailed national-security justification is expressly required only for an individual beneficiary. The reported substitute adds the redress study and renumbers the existing seven-year sunset; removal of struck identifiers in the engrossed text is not repeal of retained authorities.'}

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

7 terms
"enabling country" §3(a)(3)

A country whose authorities permit or facilitate scam operations, or whose ineffective enforcement or legislation lets operators obtain facilitating services.

"forced criminality" §3(a)(4)

Forced labor that causes a trafficking victim to engage in criminal activity, potentially including cyber-enabled fraud.

"relevant foreign assistance" §3(a)(6)

Unclassified voluntary U.S.-funded support to foreign countries against scam compounds and related criminal organizations; intelligence activities are excluded.

"impacted country" §3(a)(9)

A significant source or transit location for trafficking victims, or a significant target of scam-compound cyber-enabled fraud.

"good" §6(f)(2)

Physical articles, substances, material, supplies and manufactured products, including inspection and test equipment, but excluding technical data, for the import-sanctions exclusion.

"scam compound" §3(a)(10)

A physical installation used by a significant transnational criminal organization for cyber-enabled fraud, frequently using trafficking victims.

"significant transnational criminal organization" §3(a)(11)

A group including a foreign person, engaged in serious crime across the specified national jurisdictions, that threatens U.S. national security, foreign policy or the economy.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology