S2935-119

Introduced

To prohibit State and local law enforcement officers from arresting foreign nationals within the United States solely on the basis of an indictment, warrant, or request issued by the International Criminal Court, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Sep 29, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill prohibits state and local law enforcement officers from arresting, detaining, or taking any action against foreign nationals based solely on warrants, indictments, or requests from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The US is not a party to the Rome Statute that established the ICC, and this bill asserts federal authority over any interaction with the court.

Who Benefits and How

Foreign nationals visiting or residing in the US benefit from protection against state/local arrest based on ICC actions. The federal government gains exclusive control over ICC-related enforcement decisions. Foreign governments whose officials might face ICC indictments benefit from clearer US non-cooperation with the ICC at the state level.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State and local law enforcement agencies lose the ability to independently cooperate with the ICC or enforce its warrants. International justice advocates face reduced US cooperation with the ICC. Victims of international crimes whose perpetrators seek refuge in the US may face reduced avenues for justice.

Key Provisions

  • State and local officers cannot arrest, detain, or deprive liberty to foreign nationals based solely on ICC warrants or indictments
  • No state or local cooperation with ICC or use of funds/facilities/personnel for ICC enforcement
  • Federal preemption of any state or local law that allows ICC cooperation
  • Exceptions only for explicit Congressional authorization or Presidential certification of national security interest

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Prohibits state and local law enforcement from arresting foreign nationals based solely on International Criminal Court warrants, indictments, or requests, reserving such authority to the federal government.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Policy, Law Enforcement, Constitutional Law, International Law

Primary Purpose

Prohibits state and local law enforcement from arresting foreign nationals based solely on International Criminal Court warrants, indictments, or requests, reserving such authority to the federal government.

Policy Domains

Foreign Policy Law Enforcement Constitutional Law International Law

Sovereign Enforcement Integrity Act of 2025

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Foreign nationals in the US
  • Federal government
  • Foreign government officials facing ICC indictments
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • State and local law enforcement
  • International justice advocates
  • Victims of international crimes
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 29, 2025

Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 3 clauses
-4 negative

State and local governments (enforcement authority), State and local law enforcement agencies, State legislatures and local governments

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Federal government (foreign relations authority), Federal government (supremacy)

International Organizations
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

International Criminal Court

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Foreign nationals in the United States

Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Foreign government officials facing ICC indictments

Advocacy Groups
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

International justice and human rights advocates

3/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Policy Law Enforcement Constitutional Law

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology