Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025 prevents foreign persons from using U.S. courts to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards that arise because a U.S. person complied with U.S. sanctions or export controls. It is aimed at situations where sanctions make contract performance impossible or where a foreign court or tribunal asserted jurisdiction based on U.S. sanctions, export controls, or foreign laws reacting to those controls.
The bill adds a new Section 1660 to Chapter 111 of title 28. Covered enforcement actions can be removed by defendants to federal district court, and the federal court must dismiss them. The policy statement makes clear that U.S. persons should not be disadvantaged for good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.
Who Benefits and How
U.S. companies, U.S. exporters, financial institutions, defense contractors, logistics firms, and other United States persons benefit because foreign counterparties cannot use U.S. courts to collect covered foreign judgments tied to sanctions compliance. Federal courts benefit from a clear removal-and-dismissal rule rather than case-by-case uncertainty.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Foreign judgment creditors, Russian counterparties, foreign arbitral award holders, and foreign persons suing over sanctions-disrupted contracts lose an enforcement path in U.S. courts. Federal courts must process removals and dismiss covered actions. Contract counterparties in sanctioned jurisdictions bear litigation risk when their claims depend on conduct required by U.S. sanctions or export controls.
Key Provisions
- Establishes U.S. policy that sanctions-compliant U.S. persons should not be disadvantaged.
- Prohibits enforcement in U.S. courts of covered foreign judgments or arbitral awards.
- Restricts covered arbitral-award enforcement when claims arise from U.S. sanctions or export controls.
- Allows defendants to remove covered enforcement actions to federal district court.
- Requires federal courts to dismiss covered actions after removal.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Bars enforcement in U.S. courts of foreign judgments or arbitral awards arising from U.S. persons' good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.
Key Policy Areas
Foreign Policy, Trade, Judiciary
Primary Purpose
Bars enforcement in U.S. courts of foreign judgments or arbitral awards arising from U.S. persons' good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- U.S. companies complying with sanctions
- U.S. export-control compliance officers
- Financial institutions processing sanctioned contracts
- Defense contractors with Russia-related contracts
- Logistics firms following export controls
- Federal courts
Identified Costs
- Foreign judgment creditors
- Russian contract counterparties
- Foreign arbitral award holders
- Foreign companies suing over sanctions-disrupted contracts
- Federal courts
Sponsors
John Cornyn
R-TX | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
Passed SenateHeld at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2073-2074; …
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous …
Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. …
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment …
Introduced in Senate
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Foreign arbitral award holders, Foreign judgment creditors, Foreign persons seeking compensation
U.S. companies complying with sanctions, U.S. persons facing sanctions-related foreign judgments
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology