S2934-119

Passed Senate

Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Sep 29, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025 prevents foreign persons from using U.S. courts to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards that arise because a U.S. person complied with U.S. sanctions or export controls. It is aimed at situations where sanctions make contract performance impossible or where a foreign court or tribunal asserted jurisdiction based on U.S. sanctions, export controls, or foreign laws reacting to those controls.

The bill adds a new Section 1660 to Chapter 111 of title 28. Covered enforcement actions can be removed by defendants to federal district court, and the federal court must dismiss them. The policy statement makes clear that U.S. persons should not be disadvantaged for good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. companies, U.S. exporters, financial institutions, defense contractors, logistics firms, and other United States persons benefit because foreign counterparties cannot use U.S. courts to collect covered foreign judgments tied to sanctions compliance. Federal courts benefit from a clear removal-and-dismissal rule rather than case-by-case uncertainty.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Foreign judgment creditors, Russian counterparties, foreign arbitral award holders, and foreign persons suing over sanctions-disrupted contracts lose an enforcement path in U.S. courts. Federal courts must process removals and dismiss covered actions. Contract counterparties in sanctioned jurisdictions bear litigation risk when their claims depend on conduct required by U.S. sanctions or export controls.

Key Provisions

  • Establishes U.S. policy that sanctions-compliant U.S. persons should not be disadvantaged.
  • Prohibits enforcement in U.S. courts of covered foreign judgments or arbitral awards.
  • Restricts covered arbitral-award enforcement when claims arise from U.S. sanctions or export controls.
  • Allows defendants to remove covered enforcement actions to federal district court.
  • Requires federal courts to dismiss covered actions after removal.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Bars enforcement in U.S. courts of foreign judgments or arbitral awards arising from U.S. persons' good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.

Key Policy Areas

Foreign Policy, Trade, Judiciary

Primary Purpose

Bars enforcement in U.S. courts of foreign judgments or arbitral awards arising from U.S. persons' good-faith compliance with U.S. sanctions or export controls.

Policy Domains

Foreign Policy Trade Judiciary

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • U.S. companies complying with sanctions
  • U.S. export-control compliance officers
  • Financial institutions processing sanctioned contracts
  • Defense contractors with Russia-related contracts
  • Logistics firms following export controls
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Federal courts: , ,
U.S. companies complying with sanctions: , ,
U.S. export-control compliance officers: , ,
Logistics firms following export controls: , ,
Defense contractors with Russia-related contracts: , ,
Financial institutions processing sanctioned contracts: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Foreign judgment creditors
  • Russian contract counterparties
  • Foreign arbitral award holders
  • Foreign companies suing over sanctions-disrupted contracts
  • Federal courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Federal courts: , ,
Foreign judgment creditors: , ,
Foreign arbitral award holders: , ,
Russian contract counterparties: , ,
Foreign companies suing over sanctions-disrupted contracts: , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
May 4, 2026

Held at the desk.

May 4, 2026

Received in the House.

May 1, 2026

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Apr 28, 2026

Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2073-2074; …

Apr 28, 2026

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous …

Mar 26, 2026

Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment

Mar 26, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Mar 26, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. …

Mar 26, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment …

Sep 29, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Foreign Entities
11 mentions across 6 clauses
-11 negative

Foreign arbitral award holders, Foreign judgment creditors, Foreign persons seeking compensation

Trade
6 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive

U.S. companies complying with sanctions, U.S. persons facing sanctions-related foreign judgments

Judiciary
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

Federal courts

2/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Foreign Policy Trade Judiciary

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology