S2913-119

Introduced

To prohibit the use of appropriated funds to eliminate, consolidate, or otherwise restructure any office within the Department of Education that administers or enforces programs serving individuals with disabilities.

119th Congress Introduced Sep 18, 2025

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 18, 2025

Ms. Alsobrooks (for herself, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Luján, Mr. …

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill prevents the federal government from using taxpayer money to eliminate, consolidate, or reorganize offices within the Department of Education that serve students and individuals with disabilities. It specifically protects two offices: the Office of Special Education Programs (which oversees special education for children) and the Rehabilitation Services Administration (which helps people with disabilities get jobs). The bill is a defensive measure responding to concerns that the executive branch might try to restructure or eliminate these offices without Congressional approval.

Who Benefits and How

Students with disabilities and their families benefit because the bill preserves the dedicated offices that administer special education programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Individuals with disabilities receiving vocational rehabilitation services also benefit from continued support from a specialized federal office. The roughly 7 million students receiving special education services nationwide benefit from organizational stability and continuity. Federal employees working in these disability-focused offices gain job security and protection from reorganization efforts. Disability advocacy groups benefit from maintaining dedicated federal offices they can work with on policy implementation.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Executive branch officials, particularly the Secretary of Education and White House staff, face restrictions on their ability to reorganize the Department of Education. This reduces administrative flexibility and prevents cost-saving consolidations they might otherwise pursue. Office of Management and Budget planners lose the option to streamline government operations by merging these offices with other education programs. If reorganization would have achieved efficiencies, taxpayers may bear the cost of maintaining separate administrative structures. However, the bill's supporters argue this "burden" is actually a safeguard ensuring that disability services remain a distinct priority rather than being diluted within broader education programs.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits spending any federal appropriated funds to eliminate, consolidate, or restructure Department of Education offices that administer programs for individuals with disabilities, including under IDEA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
  • Bars using funds to terminate, reassign, or change the job duties of staff in these offices in ways that would prevent the offices from meeting their legal obligations under federal disability laws
  • Prevents the Department of Education from contracting out or delegating these disability programs to organizations outside the federal Department of Education
  • Reaffirms that Congress previously established these offices in statute (Office of Special Education Programs under Section 603 of IDEA, and Rehabilitation Services Administration under Section 3 of the Rehabilitation Act) and that the executive branch cannot unilaterally alter this framework
  • Takes effect immediately upon passage and applies to all future appropriations bills
Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
Generated: Dec 24, 2025 05:32

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Prohibit use of appropriated funds to eliminate, consolidate, or restructure Department of Education offices that administer programs serving individuals with disabilities

Policy Domains

Education Disability Rights Government Administration Appropriations

Legislative Strategy

"Defensive legislation to prevent executive branch reorganization of disability services; reaffirms Congressional authority over agency structure"

Likely Beneficiaries

  • Students with disabilities and their families
  • Individuals with disabilities receiving vocational rehabilitation services
  • Disability advocacy organizations
  • Department of Education staff in Office of Special Education Programs and Rehabilitation Services Administration

Likely Burden Bearers

  • Executive branch officials seeking to reorganize Department of Education
  • Budget officials seeking administrative consolidation

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Education Disability Rights
Actor Mappings
"department_of_education"
→ Department of Education
"office_of_special_education_programs"
→ Office of Special Education Programs (within Department of Education)
"rehabilitation_services_administration"
→ Rehabilitation Services Administration (within Department of Education)

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"Office of Special Education Programs" §section_2

Office housed within the Department of Education per Section 603 of IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1402), tasked with administering programs concerning education of children with disabilities

"programs serving individuals with disabilities" §section_3

Programs under IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.), or any other applicable Federal laws

"Rehabilitation Services Administration" §section_2_b

Office housed within the Department of Education per Section 3 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 702), tasked with administering workforce investment activities for individuals with disabilities

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology