S2887-119

Reported

Route 66 National Historic Trail Designation Act

119th Congress Introduced Sep 18, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill adds the Route 66 National Historic Trail to the National Trails System, covering all U.S. Highway 66 alignments used between 1926 and 1985 from Chicago to Santa Monica, as shown on a 2017 map kept by Interior. The Interior Secretary must administer the trail while respecting its distinctive character and must actively consult affected Indian Tribes before activities with substantial direct tribal impacts. Outside existing federally managed areas, the United States may acquire land only with owner consent, acquisitions may not average more than one-quarter mile on either side, and eminent domain is prohibited. The designation creates no buffer zone, cannot regulate visible or audible off-trail activity, cannot hinder energy development or transmission, does not convert corridor land into National Park System land for Mineral Leasing Act purposes, preserves all existing right-of-way authority, and triggers no new federal permit solely because of trail status.

Who Benefits and How

Route 66 communities, heritage organizations, tourism businesses, and visitors benefit from a national designation that can support preservation, interpretation, promotion, and travel along the historic corridor. Affected Indian tribal governments benefit from a specific duty of active, meaningful, and timely consultation before Interior undertakes trail activity with substantial direct tribal impacts. Adjacent landowners, energy developers, utilities, and right-of-way applicants benefit from explicit limits on acquisition, condemnation, buffer zones, new permits, and interference with development or easement authority.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Department of the Interior and other federal land-agency administrators must manage and map the 2,400-mile corridor, preserve public access to the map, conduct tribal consultation, and apply the bill's detailed land and right-of-way safeguards. Federal taxpayers bear trail-administration and any consensual acquisition costs, while owners who voluntarily sell an interest must work within the one-quarter-mile average acquisition limit.

Key Provisions

  • Designates all historic Route 66 alignments from Chicago to Santa Monica as a National Historic Trail.
  • Requires Interior administration that respects the route's distinctive character and timely consultation with affected Indian Tribes.
  • Limits land acquisition outside federal areas to willing owners and prohibits eminent domain or condemnation.
  • Provides that no buffer zone is created and off-trail land uses may not be controlled merely because they are perceptible from the trail.
  • Protects energy development, transportation, transmission, and existing right-of-way authority.
  • Exempts the designation from creating new federal permit requirements or specified National Park System land status.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Designate the approximately 2,400-mile historic Route 66 corridor as a National Historic Trail with tribal consultation and strong private-land, energy, right-of-way, and permit safeguards.

Key Policy Areas

Historic Preservation, Public Lands, Transportation, Tribal Affairs

Primary Purpose

Designate the approximately 2,400-mile historic Route 66 corridor as a National Historic Trail with tribal consultation and strong private-land, energy, right-of-way, and permit safeguards.

Policy Domains

Historic Preservation Public Lands Transportation Tribal Affairs

Route 66 National Historic Trail Designation Act

Identified Gains
  • Route 66 tourism businesses and heritage organizations
  • Affected Indian tribal governments
  • Adjacent private landowners
  • Energy developers and utilities
  • Historic-trail visitors
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Historic-trail visitors:
Adjacent private landowners:
Energy developers and utilities:
Affected Indian tribal governments:
Route 66 tourism businesses and heritage organizations:
Identified Costs
  • Department of the Interior trail administrators
  • Federal land-agency staff
  • Federal taxpayers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal taxpayers:
Federal land-agency staff:
Department of the Interior trail administrators:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 29, 2026

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported …

Jul 21, 2026

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. …

Sep 18, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Schmitt, …

Sep 18, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and …

Sep 18, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
2 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive

Adjacent private landowners, Route 66 historic-trail visitors

Tourism
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Route 66 tourism businesses

Tribal Nations
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Affected Indian Tribes

Energy
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Energy developers near the trail corridor

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Department of the Interior trail administrators

1/2
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Historic Preservation Public Lands Transportation Tribal Affairs
Actor Mappings
"landowners"
→ Owners of land outside federally managed areas along Route 66
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Interior
"consulted_governments"
→ Affected Indian Tribes

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"Route 66 National Historic Trail" §route_66_national_historic_trail

All alignments of U.S. Highway 66 in existence from 1926 through 1985 along the approximately 2,400-mile Chicago-to-Santa Monica route depicted on the December 2017 map.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology