To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and the Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and for other purposes.
Summary
What This Bill Does
Requires the NOAA Administrator and the NIST Director, in consultation with CBP and the Coast Guard, to jointly develop a standard chemical-analysis methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood. The method must support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, work for federal and state law-enforcement needs, minimize processing time, use a field kit one person can carry, and, where practicable, test prepared foods such as ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke. The bill requires pilot studies on Gulf red snapper as a stationary stock and bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna as highly migratory stocks.
Who Benefits and How
NOAA Fisheries enforcement, CBP seafood inspectors, Coast Guard boarding teams, federal and state law-enforcement agencies, domestic red snapper fisheries, domestic tuna fishing operations, and legitimate seafood importers benefit from a stronger tool for detecting seafood whose origin claims do not match chemical signatures. NIST researchers and scientific-testing equipment manufacturers gain a concrete federal methodology-development mandate. Foreign partner maritime forces benefit because DoD may provide shipriders, observers, remote sensing, data analysis, and operational intelligence for IUU fishing and transnational organized crime enforcement.
Who Bears the Burden and How
NIST, NOAA, CBP, and the Coast Guard must develop the method, conduct pilot studies, plan operational deployment, and report to House and Senate committees within two years. Seafood importers face more verification risk once the method is operational, especially when origin claims for red snapper, tuna, or prepared seafood are suspect. Illegal fishing operators face higher detection and interdiction risk. The Department of Defense and Coast Guard bear operational costs if they provide maritime technical assistance to partner nations.
Key Provisions
- Requires NOAA and NIST to develop a standard chemical-analysis method for seafood country-of-origin identification.
- Requires the method to support federal and state IUU fishing enforcement, minimize processing time, and use a one-person portable field kit.
- Requires practicable testing for prepared seafood such as ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke.
- Requires pilot studies on red snapper and bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna.
- Requires a two-year report to Congress with the methodology, operationalization plan, and any impracticability explanations.
- Authorizes DoD, with the Coast Guard, to fund maritime technical assistance to foreign maritime forces combating IUU fishing and transnational organized crime.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires NOAA and NIST to create a portable chemical-analysis method for identifying seafood country of origin to support IUU fishing enforcement, and authorizes DoD maritime technical assistance to partner nations.
Key Policy Areas
Fisheries, Trade Enforcement, Science and Technology, Defense
Primary Purpose
Requires NOAA and NIST to create a portable chemical-analysis method for identifying seafood country of origin to support IUU fishing enforcement, and authorizes DoD maritime technical assistance to partner nations.
Policy Domains
Section 3 - DoD and Coast Guard IUU fishing technical assistance
Identified Gains
- Foreign partner maritime forces
- United States Coast Guard members deployed with partner platforms
- Department of Defense maritime assistance programs
Identified Costs
- Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts
- United States Coast Guard members deployed on partner vessels
Section 2 - Seafood country-of-origin chemical analysis
Identified Gains
- NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers
- CBP seafood inspectors
- Coast Guard boarding teams
- Domestic red snapper fisheries
- Domestic tuna fishing operations
- Legitimate seafood importers
- Scientific testing equipment manufacturers
Identified Costs
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- United States Coast Guard
- Illegal fishing operators
- Seafood importers subject to origin testing
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed SenateReported by Mr. Cruz, without amendment
Passed Senate (inferred from es version)
Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Britt, and Mr. …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
CBP seafood inspectors, Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts, NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers
Positive-direction: CBP seafood inspectors
Negative-direction: Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts, NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Coast Guard members deployed on partner platforms
Domestic red snapper fisheries, Domestic tuna fishing operations, Illegal fishing operations
Positive-direction: Domestic red snapper fisheries, Domestic tuna fishing operations
Negative-direction: Illegal fishing operations
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "commandant"
- → Commandant of the Coast Guard
- "commissioner"
- → Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- "administrator"
- → NOAA Administrator
- "under_secretary"
- → NIST Director / Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology
- "secretary"
- → Secretary of Defense
- "coast_guard"
- → United States Coast Guard
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
The NOAA Administrator and NIST Director, in consultation with the CBP Commissioner and Coast Guard Commandant.
Illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing targeted by maritime technical assistance.
Red snapper means Lutjanus campechanus; tuna includes bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology