S283-119

Passed Senate

To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and the Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 28, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Requires the NOAA Administrator and the NIST Director, in consultation with CBP and the Coast Guard, to jointly develop a standard chemical-analysis methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood. The method must support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, work for federal and state law-enforcement needs, minimize processing time, use a field kit one person can carry, and, where practicable, test prepared foods such as ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke. The bill requires pilot studies on Gulf red snapper as a stationary stock and bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna as highly migratory stocks.

Who Benefits and How

NOAA Fisheries enforcement, CBP seafood inspectors, Coast Guard boarding teams, federal and state law-enforcement agencies, domestic red snapper fisheries, domestic tuna fishing operations, and legitimate seafood importers benefit from a stronger tool for detecting seafood whose origin claims do not match chemical signatures. NIST researchers and scientific-testing equipment manufacturers gain a concrete federal methodology-development mandate. Foreign partner maritime forces benefit because DoD may provide shipriders, observers, remote sensing, data analysis, and operational intelligence for IUU fishing and transnational organized crime enforcement.

Who Bears the Burden and How

NIST, NOAA, CBP, and the Coast Guard must develop the method, conduct pilot studies, plan operational deployment, and report to House and Senate committees within two years. Seafood importers face more verification risk once the method is operational, especially when origin claims for red snapper, tuna, or prepared seafood are suspect. Illegal fishing operators face higher detection and interdiction risk. The Department of Defense and Coast Guard bear operational costs if they provide maritime technical assistance to partner nations.

Key Provisions

  • Requires NOAA and NIST to develop a standard chemical-analysis method for seafood country-of-origin identification.
  • Requires the method to support federal and state IUU fishing enforcement, minimize processing time, and use a one-person portable field kit.
  • Requires practicable testing for prepared seafood such as ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke.
  • Requires pilot studies on red snapper and bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna.
  • Requires a two-year report to Congress with the methodology, operationalization plan, and any impracticability explanations.
  • Authorizes DoD, with the Coast Guard, to fund maritime technical assistance to foreign maritime forces combating IUU fishing and transnational organized crime.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires NOAA and NIST to create a portable chemical-analysis method for identifying seafood country of origin to support IUU fishing enforcement, and authorizes DoD maritime technical assistance to partner nations.

Key Policy Areas

Fisheries, Trade Enforcement, Science and Technology, Defense

Primary Purpose

Requires NOAA and NIST to create a portable chemical-analysis method for identifying seafood country of origin to support IUU fishing enforcement, and authorizes DoD maritime technical assistance to partner nations.

Policy Domains

Fisheries Trade Enforcement Science and Technology Defense

Section 3 - DoD and Coast Guard IUU fishing technical assistance

Identified Gains
  • Foreign partner maritime forces
  • United States Coast Guard members deployed with partner platforms
  • Department of Defense maritime assistance programs
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Foreign partner maritime forces:
Department of Defense maritime assistance programs:
United States Coast Guard members deployed with partner platforms:
Identified Costs
  • Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts
  • United States Coast Guard members deployed on partner vessels
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts:
United States Coast Guard members deployed on partner vessels:

Section 2 - Seafood country-of-origin chemical analysis

Identified Gains
  • NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers
  • CBP seafood inspectors
  • Coast Guard boarding teams
  • Domestic red snapper fisheries
  • Domestic tuna fishing operations
  • Legitimate seafood importers
  • Scientific testing equipment manufacturers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
CBP seafood inspectors:
Coast Guard boarding teams:
Legitimate seafood importers:
Domestic red snapper fisheries:
Domestic tuna fishing operations:
NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers:
Scientific testing equipment manufacturers:
Identified Costs
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection
  • United States Coast Guard
  • Illegal fishing operators
  • Seafood importers subject to origin testing
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Illegal fishing operators:
United States Coast Guard:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection:
Seafood importers subject to origin testing:
National Institute of Standards and Technology:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
May 21, 2025

Reported by Mr. Cruz, without amendment

May 21, 2025 (inferred)

Passed Senate (inferred from es version)

Jan 28, 2025

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Britt, and Mr. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
5 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -4 negative

CBP seafood inspectors, Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts, NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers

Positive-direction: CBP seafood inspectors

Negative-direction: Department of Defense operation and maintenance accounts, NOAA Fisheries enforcement officers, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Coast Guard members deployed on partner platforms

Fishing & Forestry
3 mentions across 1 clause
+2 positive -1 negative

Domestic red snapper fisheries, Domestic tuna fishing operations, Illegal fishing operations

Positive-direction: Domestic red snapper fisheries, Domestic tuna fishing operations

Negative-direction: Illegal fishing operations

Trade
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Seafood importers subject to origin testing

Foreign Entities
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Foreign partner maritime forces

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Fisheries Trade Enforcement Science and Technology
Actor Mappings
"commandant"
→ Commandant of the Coast Guard
"commissioner"
→ Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
"administrator"
→ NOAA Administrator
"under_secretary"
→ NIST Director / Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology
Domains
Fisheries Defense
Actor Mappings
"secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense
"coast_guard"
→ United States Coast Guard

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"key agency leadership" §2

The NOAA Administrator and NIST Director, in consultation with the CBP Commissioner and Coast Guard Commandant.

"IUU fishing" §3

Illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing targeted by maritime technical assistance.

"red snapper and tuna" §2(a)

Red snapper means Lutjanus campechanus; tuna includes bigeye, yellowfin, and bluefin tuna.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology