S2657-119

Reported

STOP China and Russia Act of 2025

119th Congress Introduced Aug 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill targets mutual military support between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. It defines PRC, Russian, foreign, and U.S. persons; sets findings on Chinese support for Russia's defense industrial base and Russian support for People's Liberation Army capabilities near Taiwan; requires sanctions after 90 days on foreign persons knowingly supplying listed goods or weapons support; blocks property under IEEPA; imposes visa and immigration consequences; requires determinations on named Chinese arms and nuclear/shipbuilding corporations; and requires State and Treasury to coordinate allied diplomatic, sanctions, export-control, financial-sector, and private-sector compliance strategies with quarterly progress reports.

Who Benefits and How

Ukraine benefits indirectly because the bill seeks to disrupt PRC support for Russia's defense industrial base and war effort. Taiwan benefits because the reported bill also targets Russian support that improves PLA capabilities for Taiwan Strait operations. United States national security agencies benefit from mandatory sanctions, reporting, and allied coordination tools. Allied governments benefit from a U.S. strategy for coordinated export controls, sanctions, and diplomatic engagement. Financial institutions benefit from clearer compliance engagement on PRC-Russian defense support sanctions. Congressional foreign affairs and banking committees benefit from determinations and 90-day progress reports.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The President must impose property-blocking and visa sanctions on covered foreign persons beginning 90 days after enactment. PRC defense suppliers face sanctions if they knowingly provide goods, services, weapons, or components to Russian military or defense-industrial end users. Russian Federation suppliers face sanctions if they help PLA military operations in the Taiwan Strait under the reported version. Named PRC arms manufacturers must be reviewed within 90 days for sanctions determinations. The Secretary of State and Secretary of the Treasury must produce an allied coordination strategy and quarterly implementation reports.

Key Provisions

  • Defines PRC persons, Russian Federation persons, foreign persons, U.S. persons, and knowingly for sanctions coverage.
  • Requires sanctions on covered PRC or Russian-linked persons that knowingly support Russia's defense industrial base or PLA Taiwan Strait capabilities.
  • Blocks property and interests in property under IEEPA and imposes visa inadmissibility, revocation, and immigration benefit bars.
  • Requires determinations on named PRC arms, nuclear, electronics, aerospace, aviation, shipbuilding, and industrial corporations.
  • Directs a State-Treasury strategy with allies and partners on coordinated sanctions, export controls, financial compliance, and diplomatic action.
  • Requires 90-day progress reports on the implementation and efficacy of the strategy.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires sanctions against PRC and Russian persons that materially support each other's defense industrial bases, directs determinations on named PRC arms manufacturers, and requires a State-Treasury strategy with allies and partners to coordinate sanctions, export controls, financial compliance, and diplomatic actions.

Key Policy Areas

Sanctions, Foreign Affairs, National Security

Primary Purpose

Requires sanctions against PRC and Russian persons that materially support each other's defense industrial bases, directs determinations on named PRC arms manufacturers, and requires a State-Treasury strategy with allies and partners to coordinate sanctions, export controls, financial compliance, and diplomatic actions.

Policy Domains

Sanctions Foreign Affairs National Security

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • United States national security agencies
  • Allied government agencies
  • Financial regulators
  • Congressional foreign affairs committees
  • Congressional banking committees
  • United States sanctions offices
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Financial regulators: , , , , ,
Allied government agencies: , , , , ,
United States sanctions offices: , , , , ,
Congressional banking committees: , , , , ,
Congressional foreign affairs committees: , , , , ,
United States national security agencies: , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • PRC defense manufacturers
  • Russian Federation defense contractors
  • Named PRC arms manufacturers
  • Secretary of State
  • Secretary of the Treasury
  • Financial institutions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Secretary of State: , , , , ,
Financial institutions: , , , , ,
PRC defense manufacturers: , , , , ,
Secretary of the Treasury: , , , , ,
Named PRC arms manufacturers: , , , , ,
Russian Federation defense contractors: , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Oct 30, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Oct 30, 2025

Reported by Mr. Risch, with an amendment

Oct 30, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an …

Oct 22, 2025

Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an …

Aug 1, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Aug 1, 2025

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following …

Aug 1, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Aug 1, 2025

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Foreign Entities
22 mentions across 11 clauses
+22 positive

Taiwan, Ukraine

Government
22 mentions across 11 clauses
+11 positive -11 negative

Secretary of State, United States national security agencies

Positive-direction: United States national security agencies

Negative-direction: Secretary of State

Defense
22 mentions across 11 clauses
-22 negative

PRC defense suppliers, Russian Federation suppliers

7/11
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Sanctions Foreign Affairs National Security
Actor Mappings
"state"
→ Secretary of State
"treasury"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"president"
→ President

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology