S2601-118

Introduced

To provide for the protection of agricultural workers, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Jul 27, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill, the "Protecting America's Food Workers Act," strengthens workplace protections for agricultural and meat/poultry processing workers. It requires USDA contractors to pay prevailing wages, restricts dangerous production line speeds, mandates ergonomic safety standards, and enhances OSHA enforcement at meat processing plants.

Who Benefits and How

Meat and poultry processing workers benefit most directly through safer working conditions, guaranteed bathroom breaks, protection from punitive attendance policies that penalize sick leave, and a new private right to sue employers who violate safety laws. Agricultural workers gain protections through wage requirements and accountability measures for companies receiving USDA contracts. Labor unions benefit from expanded access to represent workers during safety inspections.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Meat and poultry processing companies face significant new compliance costs: they must meet stricter ergonomic standards, limit line speeds, allow worker representatives during inspections, and can be sued directly by workers for safety violations. USDA food contractors must pay prevailing wages, disclose labor law violations, and cannot buy back stock while receiving federal funds. Companies using "no-fault attendance policies" must stop penalizing workers for legally protected absences like sick leave.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits USDA from purchasing food from companies paying workers less than prevailing wages
  • Bans agricultural companies receiving USDA funds from stock buybacks
  • Restricts meat processing line speed waivers and requires worker safety reviews
  • Makes "no-fault attendance policies" that penalize sick leave an unlawful employment practice
  • Requires OSHA to issue ergonomic standards for meat processing within one year
  • Creates private right of action allowing workers to sue for safety violations
  • Appropriates $60 million annually (2024-2029) for additional OSHA inspectors
  • Requires GAO study on racial and ethnic disparities in meat processing workforce

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Strengthens worker protections in agriculture and meat/poultry processing by requiring prevailing wages for USDA contractors, restricting line speeds, mandating ergonomic standards, enhancing OSHA enforcement, and protecting workers from retaliation

Who Benefits

  • Meat and poultry processing workers
  • Agricultural workers
  • Labor unions

Who Bears Costs

  • Meat and poultry processing companies
  • USDA food contractors
  • Agricultural employers

Key Policy Areas

Labor, Agriculture, Food Safety, Occupational Health and Safety, Worker Rights

Primary Purpose

Strengthens worker protections in agriculture and meat/poultry processing by requiring prevailing wages for USDA contractors, restricting line speeds, mandating ergonomic standards, enhancing OSHA enforcement, and protecting workers from retaliation

Policy Domains

Labor Agriculture Food Safety Occupational Health and Safety Worker Rights

Legislative Strategy

"Comprehensive worker protection framework targeting the meat and poultry processing industry through wage requirements, line speed restrictions, OSHA enforcement enhancements, and anti-retaliation measures"

Identified Gains

  • Meat and poultry processing workers
  • Agricultural workers
  • Labor unions
  • Worker advocacy organizations

Identified Costs

  • Meat and poultry processing companies
  • USDA food contractors
  • Agricultural employers
  • Companies with no-fault attendance policies

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 27, 2023

Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. Booker, and Mr. Wyden) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Food & Beverage
2 mentions across 1 clause
+1 positive -1 negative

Food processing companies selling to USDA, Food processing workers

Positive-direction: Food processing workers

Negative-direction: Food processing companies selling to USDA

Labor
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Labor unions in food processing

23/30
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Agriculture Labor Government Contracting Food Supply
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Agriculture
"secretary_of_labor"
→ Secretary of Labor
Domains
Occupational Health and Safety Food Safety Labor
Actor Mappings
"the_director"
→ Director of NIOSH
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Agriculture
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of Food Safety Inspection Service
"the_assistant_secretary"
→ Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health
Domains
Labor Worker Rights
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Labor
Domains
Occupational Health and Safety Labor
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Labor
Domains
Labor
Domains
Labor Civil Rights
Actor Mappings
"comptroller_general"
→ Comptroller General of the United States

Note: 'The Secretary' refers to Secretary of Agriculture in Title I and Title II Part 1 (Sections 101-211), but refers to Secretary of Labor in Title II Parts 2 and 3 (Sections 221-241)

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

8 terms
"meat" §101

Meat within the meaning of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)

"poultry and poultry product" §101_poultry

Have the meanings given in section 4 of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 453)

"processed food" §101_processed_food

Has the meaning given in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321)

"covered entity" §221_covered_entity

Has the meaning of respondent in section 701(n) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including federal and state employing offices

"meat food product" §101_meat_food_product

Has the meaning given in section 1 of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601)

"covered establishment" §202_covered_establishment

An official establishment subject to inspection under the Federal Meat Inspection Act or the Poultry Products Inspection Act

"legally protected leave" §221_legally_protected_leave

Leave protected under Federal, State, or local law applicable to the employee

"no fault attendance policy" §221_no_fault_attendance_policy

A policy where employees face consequences for any absence through assessment of points or deductions from time bank, leading to progressive disciplinary action

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology