S2600-119

Introduced

To require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.

119th Congress Introduced Jul 31, 2025

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 31, 2025

Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Summary

What This Bill Does

This bill requires the Defense Science Board to conduct a comprehensive study on how the Department of Defense should organize its digital engineering and software development activities. The study must evaluate whether DoD should create a new agency, consolidate existing digital units, or reorganize current structures to better support AI systems, software applications, and other digital technologies used for military and business operations.

Who Benefits and How

Defense technology contractors and IT service providers benefit from potential new contracting opportunities. The study specifically calls for recommendations on "unique acquisition authorities" for rapid digital deployment, which could create streamlined contract vehicles and reduce bureaucratic barriers for companies specializing in AI, software engineering, and digital solutions for defense applications.

The Defense Science Board itself gains increased prominence by being tasked with this strategic review of DoD's digital future, potentially influencing billions in future technology spending.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Existing DoD software delivery organizations and digital staff across the military departments face significant uncertainty. The study explicitly evaluates "consolidation of digital development functions" and organizational restructuring, which could result in job changes, unit eliminations, or forced transfers as the Pentagon potentially merges or eliminates current digital units.

The Office of the Secretary of Defense must allocate resources to conduct and respond to the study, and potentially implement major organizational changes, new hiring systems, and revised acquisition processes based on the Board's recommendations.

Key Provisions

  • Mandates a multi-element study covering assessment of all existing DoD digital organizations, evaluation of consolidation or reorganization options, and recommendations for new hiring and acquisition authorities
  • Requires the Defense Science Board to evaluate creating a new defense agency, integrating into existing agencies, or hybrid organizational approaches
  • Study must include transition plans with implementation timelines, resource requirements, and legislative changes needed
  • Final report due to Congress by February 1, 2027, giving the Secretary of Defense authority to comment on recommendations before congressional submission
Model: claude-opus-4-5-20250514
Generated: Dec 24, 2025 17:28

Evidence Chain:

This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

Primary Purpose

Requires the Defense Science Board to study and recommend the optimal organizational structure within the Office of the Secretary of Defense for digital solutions engineering activities

Policy Domains

Defense Technology Organizational Management

Legislative Strategy

"Conduct comprehensive organizational review to optimize digital engineering capabilities and potentially consolidate fragmented digital initiatives across DoD"

Likely Beneficiaries

  • Defense Science Board (tasked with high-profile study)
  • Defense contractors and technology companies (may benefit from new organizational structures and hiring/acquisition authorities)
  • DoD software delivery organizations (potential consolidation and enhanced authorities)

Likely Burden Bearers

  • Office of the Secretary of Defense (required to conduct study and implement recommendations)
  • Defense Science Board (resource intensive study requirements)
  • Existing DoD digital organizations (potential reorganization and job uncertainty)

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Technology Digital Engineering
Actor Mappings
"the_board"
→ Defense Science Board
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Defense

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

3 terms
"congressional defense committees" §section_1_c_2

Has the meaning given in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code

"digital solutions engineering" §section_1_c_3

The development, deployment, and sustainment of artificial intelligence systems, software applications, data engineering solutions, data analytics platforms, and other digital technologies for operational and business purposes within the Department of Defense

"software delivery organizations" §section_1_c_4

Organizational units within the military services dedicated to the rapid development, deployment, and sustainment of software applications and digital solutions

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology