S2544-119

Reported

GUARD Act

119th Congress Introduced Jul 30, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill defines elder financial fraud, general financial fraud, pig butchering, scams, and eligible federal grant funds. It permits law enforcement agencies and grantees to use listed federal grants for analysts, training, blockchain tools, data collection, tabletop exercises, and financial-sector liaisons. It requires grantee reports to grantmaking agencies, a one-year Treasury and FinCEN report on fraud efforts, a two-year national scams report estimating attempts, losses, overseas actors, organized crime, impersonation, synthetic identities, enforcement, and spending, and annual agency reports to banking, financial services, and judiciary committees.

Who Benefits and How

Elderly individuals benefit because law enforcement can use existing federal grant funds for elder financial fraud investigations, victim assistance, and specialized training. Adults with disabilities benefit because elder financial fraud is defined to include illegal use of the resources of an adult with a disability. State law enforcement agencies benefit from explicit permission to spend eligible grants on analysts, tools, training, and financial-sector liaisons. Local law enforcement agencies benefit from clearer authority to use existing grants for pig-butchering and complex financial fraud investigations. Tribal law enforcement agencies benefit from the same eligible grant-use authority and coordination tools. Financial institutions benefit from designated liaisons and tabletop exercises that improve information sharing with investigators.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Law enforcement grantees must report how grant funds were used, fraud statistics, outcomes, and investigative capacity effects. Treasury and FinCEN must produce reports on financial fraud, pig butchering, elder financial fraud, scams, enforcement, losses, overseas actors, organized crime, and spending. Federal grantmaking agencies must issue annual reports to multiple congressional committees using grantee information. Scammers and fraud networks face higher investigation risk from trained personnel, blockchain tools, data collection, and financial-sector coordination.

Key Provisions

  • Defines elder financial fraud, eligible federal grant funds, general financial fraud, pig butchering, scams, and state coverage.
  • Allows eligible federal grants to fund analysts, agents, experts, training, software, blockchain tools, data reporting, tabletop exercises, and financial-sector liaisons.
  • Requires grantees using funds for these purposes to report fund amounts, uses, fraud statistics, and investigative-capacity effects.
  • Requires Treasury and FinCEN reports on fraud efforts and the state of scams in the United States.
  • Requires annual reports by grantmaking agencies to banking, financial services, and judiciary committees.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Allows existing federal grant funds to be used for state, local, and Tribal investigations of elder financial fraud, pig-butchering scams, and general financial fraud, and requires Treasury, FinCEN, law enforcement grantees, and grantmaking agencies to report fraud trends, grant uses, enforcement actions, and scam losses.

Key Policy Areas

Financial Services, Law Enforcement, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Allows existing federal grant funds to be used for state, local, and Tribal investigations of elder financial fraud, pig-butchering scams, and general financial fraud, and requires Treasury, FinCEN, law enforcement grantees, and grantmaking agencies to report fraud trends, grant uses, enforcement actions, and scam losses.

Policy Domains

Financial Services Law Enforcement Consumer Protection

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • Elderly individuals
  • Adults with disabilities
  • State law enforcement agencies
  • Local law enforcement agencies
  • Tribal law enforcement agencies
  • Financial institutions
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Elderly individuals: , , , ,
Financial institutions: , , , ,
Adults with disabilities: , , , ,
Local law enforcement agencies: , , , ,
State law enforcement agencies: , , , ,
Tribal law enforcement agencies: , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • Law enforcement grantees
  • Treasury Department
  • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
  • Federal grantmaking agencies
  • Scammers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Scammers: , , , ,
Treasury Department: , , , ,
Law enforcement grantees: , , , ,
Federal grantmaking agencies: , , , ,
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network: , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 9, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Feb 9, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. …

Feb 5, 2026

Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment …

Jul 30, 2025

Mrs. Britt (for herself, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. Scott of …

Jul 30, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Jul 30, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Jul 30, 2025

Mrs. Britt (for herself, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Scott of Florida, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
15 mentions across 5 clauses
+15 positive

Local law enforcement agencies, State law enforcement agencies, Tribal law enforcement agencies

Government
10 mentions across 5 clauses
-10 negative

Federal grantmaking agencies, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Social Security
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Elderly individuals

Disability Services
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Adults with disabilities

5/7
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Financial Services Law Enforcement Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"fincen"
→ Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
"secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology